BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8093759)

  • 21. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
    Pascal CB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dr Baltimore says "sorry".
    Baltimore D
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6322):94-5. PubMed ID: 2030740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A judgement fit for prime time.
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inside the Gallo probe.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jun; 248(4962):1494-8. PubMed ID: 2193398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Baltimore defeat a defeat for research.
    Nature; 1991 Dec; 354(6353):419-20. PubMed ID: 1660961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Imanishi-Kari case. Baltimore defends paper at center of misconduct case.
    Stone R
    Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5221):157. PubMed ID: 7618074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
    Steele F
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Breast cancer. How not to publicize a misconduct finding.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1994 Mar; 263(5154):1679. PubMed ID: 8134830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
    Palca J
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Collins' student sanctioned over 'most severe' case of fraud.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6640):313. PubMed ID: 9237737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dingell rips Healy for 'obstructionism'.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1992 Dec; 258(5089):1729. PubMed ID: 1465608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Imanishi-Kari case. Marathon hearing gets under way.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5217):1561. PubMed ID: 7777851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scientific misconduct: new court challenge for OSI.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6369):466. PubMed ID: 11642987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scientists 'too quick' to back claims.
    Nadis S
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6604):6. PubMed ID: 8900257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.