These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 809446)

  • 21. Bone bonding behavior of three kinds of apatite containing glass ceramics.
    Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Higashi S; Kakutani Y; Hyakuna K; Ito S; Kokubo T; Takagi M; Shibuya T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1986; 20(9):1295-307. PubMed ID: 3782183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Strengthening of bone-implant interface by the use of granule coatings on alumina ceramics.
    Kakutani Y; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kotoura Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Jul; 23(7):781-808. PubMed ID: 2738088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of the biocompatibility of ALCAP ceramics in rat femurs.
    Mattie DR; Bajpai PK
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Dec; 22(12):1101-26. PubMed ID: 3235456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bone bonding behavior of bead-coated alumina ceramic under load-bearing conditions.
    Takagi H; Yamamuro T; Hyakuna K; Nakamura T; Kotoura Y; Oka M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Aug; 23(A2 Suppl):161-81. PubMed ID: 2674146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of ceramics for bone replacement. A comparative study of three different porous ceramics.
    Uchida A; Nade SM; McCartney ER; Ching W
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1984 Mar; 66(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 6323483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interface reactions between machinable bioactive glass-ceramics and bone.
    Höland W; Vogel W; Naumann K; Gummel J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Mar; 19(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 4077884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Porous and porous-compact ceramics in orthopedics.
    Bieniek J; Swiecki Z
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Nov; (272):88-94. PubMed ID: 1934757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative study of ultrastructures of the interfaces between four kinds of surface-active ceramic and bone.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Bando Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Nov; 26(11):1419-32. PubMed ID: 1447227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Tissue reaction after implantation of ceramic biomaterials with introduced electrokinetic zeta potential on surface].
    Lewandowski R; Rutowski R; Staniszewska-Kuś J; Pielka S; Wnukiewicz B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15222224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of glass-ceramic bone implant materials on the in vitro formation of hydroxyapatite.
    Blumenthal NC; Posner AS; Cosma V; Gross U
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Nov; 22(11):1033-41. PubMed ID: 2853711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Piezoelectric ceramic implants: in vivo results.
    Park JB; Kelly BJ; Kenner GH; von Recum AF; Grether MF; Coffeen WW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 7348700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Osteogenesis at the dental implant interface: high-voltage electron microscopic and conventional transmission electron microscopic observations.
    Steflik DE; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Gardner LK; Hanes PJ; Lake FT; Berkery DJ; Brewer P
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jun; 27(6):791-800. PubMed ID: 8408109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tissue reaction to ceramic implant material.
    Harms J; Mäusle E
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Jan; 13(1):67-87. PubMed ID: 429386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of bioglass fixation of hip prostheses.
    Hench LL; Pantano CG; Buscemi PJ; Greenspan DC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1977 Mar; 11(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 404298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Enhancing effects of fluoride-containing ceramic implants on bone formation in the dog femur.
    Laufer D; Ben-Shachar D; Livne E; Maor G; Silbermann M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1988 Jan; 16(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 3422239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Histologic response to porous PMMA implant materials.
    Nathanson D; Gettleman L; Schnitman P; Shklar G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1978 Jan; 12(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 416033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bioglass coatings and bioglass composites as implant materials.
    Ducheyne P
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Mar; 19(3):273-91. PubMed ID: 3001091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A scanning electron microscopy study of the interface between ceramics and bone.
    Williams KR; Blayney AW; Frootko NJ; Ashton BA
    Biomaterials; 1985 Jul; 6(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 4052540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of electrical stimulation on the tensile strength of the porous implant and bone interface.
    Park JB; Kenner GH
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1975; 3(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 1191380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of repeated oral doses of demethylchlortetracycline on bones and dentin of young rhesus monkeys.
    Yen PK; Shaw JH
    J Dent Res; 1975; 54(2):358-64. PubMed ID: 46870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.