These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 809448)
1. Mechanical studies of the bone bioglass interfacial bond. Piotrowski G; Hench LL; Allen WC; Miller GJ J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):47-61. PubMed ID: 809448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of hydroxyapatite impregnation on skeletal bonding of porous coated implants. Ducheyne P; Hench LL; Kagan A; Martens M; Bursens A; Mulier JC J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 May; 14(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 7364787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of the interface in the plasma-sprayed HA coating/Ti-6Al-4V implant system. Filiaggi MJ; Coombs NA; Pilliar RM J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Oct; 25(10):1211-29. PubMed ID: 1667401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo evaluation of a high-strength, high-ductility stainless steel for use in surgical implants. Syrett BC; Davis EE J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Jul; 13(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 110810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Mechanically processable bioactive glass ceramics--a new biomaterial for bone replacement. 1]. Gummel J; Höland W; Naumann K; Vogel W Z Exp Chir Transplant Kunstliche Organe; 1983; 16(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 6666190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone-bonding behavior under load-bearing conditions of an alumina ceramic implant incorporating beads coated with glass-ceramic containing apatite and wollastonite. Li ZL; Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Chang YS; Senaha Y; Takagi H; Nakamura T; Oka M J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Sep; 29(9):1081-8. PubMed ID: 8567706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strengthening of bone-implant interface by the use of granule coatings on alumina ceramics. Kakutani Y; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kotoura Y J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Jul; 23(7):781-808. PubMed ID: 2738088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading. Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Biomechanic and histomorphometric studies of HIP titanium glass ceramic, a new implant material, compared with glass ceramics, titanium and titanium alloy]. Schmitz HJ; Fritz TR; Fuhrmann G; Gross U; Strunz V Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1990; 14(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 2102405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative experimental investigations with bioglass (L. L. Hench), Al2O3-ceramic and Al2O3-ceramic coated with a mod. Bioglass. I. Results of experiments under non-loaded conditions (author's transl)]. Griss P; Werner E; Heimke G; Buchinger R Arch Orthop Unfallchir; 1977 Nov; 90(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 597087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular bone response to plasma-sprayed coatings of hydroxyapatite. Denissen HW; Kalk W; de Nieuport HM; Maltha JC; van de Hooff A Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 2372367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of fracture mechanics theory in lifetime predictions for alumina and bioglass-coated alumina. Ritter JE; Greenspan DC; Palmer RA; Hench LL J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Mar; 13(2):251-63. PubMed ID: 429393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gap healing enhanced by hydroxyapatite coating in dogs. Søballe K; Hansen ES; Brockstedt-Rasmussen H; Hjortdal VE; Juhl GI; Pedersen CM; Hvid I; Bünger C Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Nov; (272):300-7. PubMed ID: 1657476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of ultrastructures of the interfaces between four kinds of surface-active ceramic and bone. Neo M; Kotani S; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Bando Y J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Nov; 26(11):1419-32. PubMed ID: 1447227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interface mechanics and histomorphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated and porous glass-ceramic implants in canine bone. Nimb L; Jensen JS; Gotfredsen K J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Dec; 29(12):1477-82. PubMed ID: 8600137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioglass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds: study of cell proliferation and scaffold degradation in vitro. Chen QZ; Efthymiou A; Salih V; Boccaccini AR J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Mar; 84(4):1049-60. PubMed ID: 17685403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From contacts and bondings between bone and bioactive glass to bonding of bioactive glass and porcelain to metal alloys, different methods of fracture repair. Uusalo E; Yli-Urpo A Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1991; 87(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 1896441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone quality around bioactive silica-based coated stainless steel implants: analysis by micro-Raman, XRF and XAS techniques. Ballarre J; Desimone PM; Chorro M; Baca M; Orellano JC; Ceré SM J Struct Biol; 2013 Nov; 184(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24076155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Piezoelectric ceramic implants: in vivo results. Park JB; Kelly BJ; Kenner GH; von Recum AF; Grether MF; Coffeen WW J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 7348700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]