These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8096288)
61. Swedish study questions mammography screening programmes. Mayor S BMJ; 1999 Mar; 318(7184):621. PubMed ID: 10066185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Report of the "ad hoc" committee on mammography rapport du comite "ad hoc" sur la mammographie. Léger JL; Naimark AP; Béique RA; McFarlane DV; Miller S; Miller AB J Can Assoc Radiol; 1974 Mar; 25(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 4595875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Breast density legislation. Hall FM Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):997-8. PubMed ID: 23431234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. [The information about mammography screening is not neutral]. Zahl PH Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Aug; 133(15):1557-8. PubMed ID: 23970258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Starting from scratch--some problems with Forrest. O'Doherty A; Donaghy P Clin Radiol; 1990 Aug; 42(2):143. PubMed ID: 2394074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Response. Lee CI; Bassett LW; Lehman CD Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):999-1000. PubMed ID: 23550288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Point: The New England Journal of Medicine article suggesting overdiagnosis from mammography screening is scientifically incorrect and should be withdrawn. Kopans DB J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 May; 10(5):317-9; discussion 323. PubMed ID: 23542028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. False-positive screening mammograms: good news, but more to do. Fletcher SW Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 10391816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Recent controversies in mammography screening for breast cancer. McTiernan A Medscape Womens Health; 2002; 7(2):3. PubMed ID: 12142859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: overdiagnosis in the Malmö trial was considerably underestimated. Gøtzsche PC BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7543):727. PubMed ID: 16565135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Caro JJ; O'Brien JA; Hartz SC CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):876-7; author reply 880-3. PubMed ID: 8448696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: time to tackle an underappreciated harm. Elmore JG; Fletcher SW Ann Intern Med; 2012 Apr; 156(7):536-7. PubMed ID: 22473439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Burhenne HJ CMAJ; 1993 Jul; 149(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 8324703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: update on breast cancer mortality. Miller AB; To T; Baines CJ; Wall C J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):37-41. PubMed ID: 9709273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. van Gils CH; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 Apr; 52(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 9616416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Recent results from the two Canadian breast screening trials. Duffy SW J Med Screen; 2014 Jun; 21(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 24907360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Double reading of mammography screening films--one radiologist or two. Wilson M; Asbury DL; Boggis CR Clin Radiol; 1994 Aug; 49(8):584-5. PubMed ID: 7955880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: response. Miller AB CMAJ; 1993 Nov; 149(10):1374-5. PubMed ID: 8221414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Breast screening in women aged 40-49 years: what next? Dickersin K Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1896-7. PubMed ID: 10371561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]