233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8104491)
1. The complications of central venous access systems: a study of 218 patients.
Torramadé JR; Cienfuegos JA; Hernández JL; Pardo F; Benito C; González J; Balén E; de Villa V
Eur J Surg; 1993; 159(6-7):323-7. PubMed ID: 8104491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.
Cowl CT; Weinstock JV; Al-Jurf A; Ephgrave K; Murray JA; Dillon K
Clin Nutr; 2000 Aug; 19(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 10952794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Implantable devices for central venous access in cancer patients. Our experience in 217 cases].
Torramadé J; Hernández JL; Cienfuegos JA; Albiach M; Pardo F; Benito C; González J; Voltas J
Med Clin (Barc); 1992 May; 98(19):731-3. PubMed ID: 1608278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Central venous access in pediatric patients. A 6-year experience].
Torramade Ribas J; Hernández Lizoáin JL; Benito Fernández C; González Fernández J; Balen Rivera E; Martínez Regueira F; Pardo Sánchez F; Cienfuegos Suárez JA
An Esp Pediatr; 1993 Mar; 38(3):251-4. PubMed ID: 8460845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.
Schwarz RE; Groeger JS; Coit DG
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 79(8):1635-40. PubMed ID: 9118051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective evaluation of the Port-A-Cath implantable venous access system in chronically ill adults and children.
Harvey WH; Pick TE; Reed K; Solenberger RI
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Dec; 169(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 2683154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The timing and sequence of multiple device-related complications in patients with long-term indwelling Groshong catheters.
Tolar B; Gould JR
Cancer; 1996 Sep; 78(6):1308-13. PubMed ID: 8826955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
Hoareau-Gruchet F; Rtail R; Sulaj H; Khirnetkina A; Reyt E; Righini CA
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripheral infusion ports for central venous access in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Cunningham MJ; Collins MB; Kredentser DC; Malfetano JH
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Mar; 60(3):397-9. PubMed ID: 8774645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Hickman catheter for long-term parenteral therapy. A prospective interdisciplinary study].
Lang W; Schweiger H; Richter U; Richter R; Beck JD; Krasa M; Luthin D
Med Klin (Munich); 1992 Aug; 87(8):412-7. PubMed ID: 1406473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports].
Kock HJ; Krause U; Pietsch M; Rasfeld S; Walz MK
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jan; 121(3):47-51. PubMed ID: 8565809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of percutaneous insertion and long-term usage of a new cuffed polyurethane catheter for central venous access.
Moran BJ; Sutton GL; Karran SJ
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1992 Nov; 74(6):426-9. PubMed ID: 1471841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Low-risk alternatives for ongoing venous access.
Merrell SW; Peatross BG; Grossman MD; Sullivan JJ; Harker WG
West J Med; 1994 Jan; 160(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8128698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of end-stage central venous access in children referred for possible small bowel transplantation.
Rodrigues AF; van Mourik ID; Sharif K; Barron DJ; de Giovanni JV; Bennett J; Bromley P; Protheroe S; John P; de Ville de Goyet J; Beath SV
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2006 Apr; 42(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 16641582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tunneled internal jugular catheters in adult patients: comparison of outcomes in hemodialysis versus infusion catheters.
Peynircioglu B; Ozkan F; Canyigit M; Cil BE; Balkanci F
Acta Radiol; 2007 Jul; 48(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 17611867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of subcutaneous implantable infusion systems in neoplastic and AIDS patients requiring long-term venous access.
Dionigi P; Cebrelli T; Jemos V; Minoli L; Gobbi P; Dimitrov G
Eur J Surg; 1995 Feb; 161(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 7772631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The natural history of tunneled hemodialysis catheters removed or exchanged: a single-institution experience.
Alomari AI; Falk A
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 17327555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients.
Ross MN; Haase GM; Poole MA; Burrington JD; Odom LF
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 3400032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
