593 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8104598)
1. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
Lee TY; Yang YS; Tseng LH; Ko TM; Hsu MC; Chuang SM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Norplant subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
Tseng LH; Lee TY; Yang YS; Ko TM; Chuang SM
Contraception; 1996 Mar; 53(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 8689883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
Akhter H; Dunson TR; Amatya RN; Begum K; Chowdhury T; Dighe N; Krueger SL; Rahman S
Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceptability of Norplant-2 rods as a method of family planning.
Singh K; Viegas OA; Ratnam SS
Contraception; 1992 May; 45(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 1623717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. NORPLANT contraceptive implants advancing.
Segal SJ
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 12279797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phase III clinical trial with Norplant II (two covered rods): report on five years of use.
Contraception; 1993 Aug; 48(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 8403909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experience of Thai women in Bangkok with Norplant-2 implants.
Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Tang-Usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 9866003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subdermal contraceptive implants.
Peralta O; Diaz S; Croxatto H
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 1995 Jun; 53(1-6):223-6. PubMed ID: 7626459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Return of fertility following discontinuation of Norplant-II subdermal implants. ICMR Task Force on Hormonal Contraception.
Buckshee K; Chatterjee P; Dhall GI; Hazra MN; Kodkany BS; Lalitha K; Logambal A; Manchanda P; Nanda UK; RaiChoudhury G
Contraception; 1995 Apr; 51(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7796589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Norplant contraceptive implants: rods versus capsules.
Pasquale SA; Brandeis V; Cruz RI; Kelly S; Sweeney M
Contraception; 1987 Sep; 36(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 3119287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Sirisumpan S; Tang-usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
Contraception; 1996 Jan; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.
Darney PD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. PubMed ID: 8178903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preliminary experience with Norplant in an inner city population.
Cullins VE; Blumenthal PD; Remsburg RE; Huggins GR
Contraception; 1993 Feb; 47(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 8449019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
Kirkman RJ; Bromham DR; O'Connor TP; Sahota JE
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Norplant implants in the UK: first year continuation and removals.
Peers T; Stevens JE; Graham J; Davey A
Contraception; 1996 Jun; 53(6):345-51. PubMed ID: 8773421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contraceptive implants.
Ladipo O; Coutinho EM
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 6(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 7893965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New concepts in contraception: Norplant subdermal implant.
Lynn MM; Holdcroft C
Nurse Pract; 1992 Mar; 17(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 1565306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subdermal progestin implant contraception.
Darney PD
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):470-6. PubMed ID: 1908716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptance, efficacy, and side effects of Norplant implants in four counties in north China.
Tu P; Qiu S; Fang H; Smith HL
Stud Fam Plann; 1997 Jun; 28(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 9216032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
Fleming D; Davie J; Glasier A
Contraception; 1998 Jan; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
