These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8108104)

  • 1. Image shift of intracoronal pins viewed on bite-wing and panoramic radiographs.
    Treasure P; Chandler NP; Wilson CG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 8108104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of angular measurements and assessment of distortion in the mandibular third molar region on panoramic radiographs.
    Dudhia R; Monsour PA; Savage NW; Wilson RJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Apr; 111(4):508-16. PubMed ID: 21420643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of two panoramic modalities and posterior bite-wing radiography in the detection of proximal dental caries.
    Scarfe WC; Langlais RP; Nummikoski P; Dove SB; McDavid WD; Deahl ST; Yuan CH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 8139839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.
    Pham D; Jonasson G; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Mar; 68(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20085501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of marginal bone level measurements on digital panoramic and digital intraoral radiographs.
    Hellén-Halme K; Lith A; Shi XQ
    Oral Radiol; 2020 Apr; 36(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 31004276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of linear measurements before and after digitizing periapical and panoramic radiography images.
    Langlois Cde O; Sampaio MC; Silva AE; Costa NP; Rockenbach MI
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22011897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis.
    Brocklebank LM
    Dent Update; 1998 Jun; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size.
    Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 19221809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles.
    Batenburg RH; Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 9347510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography.
    Schulze R; Krummenauer F; Schalldach F; d'Hoedt B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10654037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of the vertical magnification factor on panoramic radiographs: clinical implications for posterior mandibular implants.
    Vazquez L; Nizam Al Din Y; Christoph Belser U; Combescure C; Bernard JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 21435009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of beam alignment using different bite-wing radiographic techniques.
    Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Harrell JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Apr; 79(4):532-5. PubMed ID: 7614218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A diagnostic comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiographs.
    Flint DJ; Paunovich E; Moore WS; Wofford DT; Hermesch CB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jun; 85(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 9638709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients.
    Kim TS; Obst C; Zehaczek S; Geenen C
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18597595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technique for linear measurement on panoramic and periapical radiographs: a pilot study.
    Volchansky A; Cleaton-Jones P; Drummond S; Bönecker M
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Mar; 37(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16536146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring cortical thickness on panoramic radiographs: a validation study of the Mental Index.
    Dutra V; Susin C; da Costa NP; Veeck EB; Bahlis A; Fernandes Ada R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Nov; 104(5):686-91. PubMed ID: 17656120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A posteriori registration and subtraction of panoramic compared with intraoral radiography.
    Deserno TM; Rangarajan JR; Hoffmann J; Brägger U; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e39-45. PubMed ID: 19615643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.