These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8108153)

  • 21. Pure-tone audiometry and auditory brainstem responses in noise-induced deafness.
    Noorhassim I; Kaga K; Nishimura K
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1996; 17(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 8801813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech-in-noise testing as a marker for noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus.
    Van Eynde C; Denys S; Desloovere C; Wouters J; Verhaert N
    B-ENT; 2016; Suppl 26(1):185-191. PubMed ID: 29461742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Findings of standard and high-frequency audiometry in workers exposed to occupational noise for long durations].
    Türkkahraman S; Gök U; Karlidağ T; Keleş E; Oztürk A
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2003 Apr; 10(4):137-42. PubMed ID: 12941983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Audiological and electrophysiological assessment of professional pop/rock musicians.
    Samelli AG; Matas CG; Carvallo RM; Gomes RF; de Beija CS; Magliaro FC; Rabelo CM
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(56):6-12. PubMed ID: 22387707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The correlativity between the threshold acquired with ASSR and PTA].
    Yang XP; Fan LH; Zhou XR
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 24(5):321-4. PubMed ID: 18979911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting hearing thresholds and occupational hearing loss with multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses.
    Hsu RF; Ho CK; Lu SN; Chen SS
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 20828512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Significance of ERA for differentiating hearing disorders of different origins].
    Schmidt W; Lehnhardt E; Battmer RD
    HNO; 1983 Apr; 31(4):109-16. PubMed ID: 6853225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exaggerated hearing loss in compensation claimants.
    Alberti PW; Hyde ML; Riko K
    J Otolaryngol; 1987 Dec; 16(6):362-6. PubMed ID: 2961891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Objective BERA audiometry in the evaluation of occupational hearing loss].
    Novotný Z
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1986 Mar; 35(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 3955711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sensitive detection of noise-induced damage in human subjects using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Xu ZM; Van Cauwenberge P; Vinck B; De Vel E
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1998; 52(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 9581192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss.
    van der Drift JF; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1987; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3593096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Occupational hearing loss of market mill workers in the city of Accra, Ghana.
    Kitcher ED; Ocansey G; Abaidoo B; Atule A
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(70):183-8. PubMed ID: 24953884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of age and degree of hearing loss on the agreement and correlation between sound field audiometric thresholds and tone burst auditory brainstem response thresholds in infants and young children.
    Lee CY; Jaw FS; Pan SL; Hsieh TH; Hsu CJ
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2008 Nov; 107(11):869-75. PubMed ID: 18971156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Kowalska S; Sułkowski W
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1997; 10(4):441-59. PubMed ID: 9575669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High frequency audiometric notch: an outpatient clinic survey.
    Osei-Lah V; Yeoh LH
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Feb; 49(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 20151883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Audiometric evaluation in extended high frequencies of individuals exposed to occupational noise].
    Porto MA; Gahyva DL; Lauris JR; Lopes AC
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15609579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Agreement between auditory threshold calculated from cortical evoked response audiometry and tone audiometry in occupational hearing loss].
    Janisch R; Jerábek J
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1990 Aug; 39(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 2289246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses in evaluating the hearing thresholds of occupational noise-exposed workers.
    Hsu RF; Chen SS; Lu SN; Ho CK; Lin HF
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):330-5. PubMed ID: 21802644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.