BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8109206)

  • 1. Effects of light scatter, defocusing, mean luminosity, contrast, and central scotoma on the PVER amplitude-check size function curve.
    Katsumi O; Tetsuka H; Tetsuka S; Hoon-Ohn Y; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1993 Oct; 71(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 8109206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of stimulus contrast on simultaneous steady-state pattern reversal electroretinogram and visual evoked response.
    Tetsuka S; Katsumi O; Mehta M; Tetsuka H; Hirose T
    Ophthalmic Res; 1992; 24(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 1608596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of optical defocus on the steady state pattern reversal visual-evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Sakaue H; Mehta M; Rosenstein RB
    Ophthalmic Res; 1990; 22(6):383-90. PubMed ID: 2089350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of light scatter on the pattern reversal visual evoked response: comparison with psychophysical results.
    Tetsuka H; Katsumi O; Morandi AJ; Tetsuka S; Wang GJ; Hirose T
    Vision Res; 1992 Jul; 32(7):1211-8. PubMed ID: 1455695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pattern reversal visual evoked response in retinitis pigmentosa.
    Paranhos FR; Katsum O; Arai M; Nehemy MB; Hirose T
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1998-1999; 96(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 10855808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of hemifield stimulation on simultaneous steady-state pattern reversal electroretinogram and visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Tetsuka S; Mehta MC; Tetsuka H; Hirose T
    Ophthalmic Res; 1993; 25(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 8321516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial tuning loss of pattern reversal visual evoked response in optic nerve disease.
    Katsumi O; Wajima R; Mehta MC; Itabashi R; Arai M; Paranhos FR; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1996 Apr; 74(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 8739685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Snellen visual acuity versus pattern reversal visual-evoked response acuity in clinical applications.
    Ohn YH; Katsumi O; Matsui Y; Tetsuka H; Hirose T
    Ophthalmic Res; 1994; 26(4):240-52. PubMed ID: 7808735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pattern reversal visual evoked response and Snellen visual acuity.
    Katsumi O; Mehta MC; Larson-Park EW; Skladzien CJ; Hirose T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1994 May; 232(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 8045436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of experimental scotomata on sequential pattern-onset, pattern-reversal and pattern-offset visual evoked potentials.
    Shawkat FS; Kriss A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1997-1998; 94(4):307-20. PubMed ID: 9858091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pattern-reversal visual-evoked response in bull's eye maculopathy associated with Stargardt's disease.
    Wajima R; Katsumi O; Mehta MC; Itabashi R; Hirose T
    Ophthalmic Res; 1995; 27(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 8539004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential amplitudes are influenced by different stimulus field sizes and scotomata.
    Junghardt A; Wildberger H; Robert Y; Török B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1993; 83(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 8334929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of number of elements and size of stimulus field on recordability of pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tsukada T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1988 Jun; 29(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 3372166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of experimental scotoma size and shape on the binocular and monocular pattern visual evoked potential.
    Geer I; Spafford MM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1994; 86(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 7813381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Steady-state visual evoked cortical potentials from stimulation of visual field quadrants. Optimizing pattern variables for the size of the field to be investigated.
    Bradnam M; Keating D; Montgomery D; Evans A; Damato B; Cluckie A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 79(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 1591969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The neurophysiologic significance of frontal negativity in pattern-reversal visual-evoked potentials.
    Kurita-Tashima S; Tobimatsu S; Nakayama-Hiromatsu M; Kato M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Jul; 33(8):2423-8. PubMed ID: 1634339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PVER amplitude check-size function curve in macular and optic nerve diseases.
    Mehta MC; Katsumi O; Wajima R; Hirose T
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1994; 34(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 7960525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Jul; 69(3):293-305. PubMed ID: 3168729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related changes in pattern visual evoked potentials: differential effects of luminance, contrast and check size.
    Tobimatsu S; Kurita-Tashima S; Nakayama-Hiromatsu M; Akazawa K; Kato M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 7681386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of objective assessment using the sweep pattern visual evoked response acuity (SPVERA) and illiterate E visual acuity].
    Liu RJ; Liu HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 22(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 17190145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.