114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8109206)
21. Effects of check size on pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic field and potential.
Nakamura M; Kakigi R; Okusa T; Hoshiyama M; Watanabe K
Brain Res; 2000 Jul; 872(1-2):77-86. PubMed ID: 10924678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Decreased contrast sensitivity in normal tension glaucoma determined by pattern visually evoked cortical potentials.
Sano N; Adachi-Usami E
Clin Neurosci; 1997; 4(5):292-4. PubMed ID: 9292258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Spatial tuning function of pattern visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients without optic neuritis history.
Taş A; Cakir Gundogan F; Akgun H; Erdem U; Sobaci G
Med Glas (Zenica); 2013 Feb; 10(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 23348170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of preferential looking acuity and pattern reversal visual evoked response acuity in pediatric patients.
Katsumi O; Denno S; Arai M; De Lopes Faria J; Hirose T
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1997 Nov; 235(11):684-90. PubMed ID: 9407225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The pattern electroretinogram: N95 amplitudes in normal subjects and optic neuritis patients.
Froehlich J; Kaufman DI
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 7681758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simultaneous pattern reversal ERG and VER recordings. Effect of stimulus field and central scotoma.
Sakaue H; Katsumi O; Mehta M; Hirose T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 31(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 2318589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Topographical analysis of peripheral vs central retina with pattern reversal visual evoked response and the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Katsumi O; Van de Velde FJ; Mehta MC; Hirose T
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1991 Oct; 69(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 1776412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Different effect of dioptric defocus vs. light scatter on the pattern electroretinogram (PERG).
Bach M; Mathieu M
Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 108(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 15104172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual function assessed by visually evoked potentials in optic pathway low-grade gliomas with and without neurofibromatosis type 1.
Dotto PF; Berezovsky A; Cappellano AM; da Silva NS; Sacai PY; Silva FAB; Fernandes AG; Rocha DM; Salomão SR
Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(3):177-189. PubMed ID: 29766345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative effects of luminance and scatter on the pattern visual evoked potential and eye-hand reaction time.
McKerral M; Lachapelle P; Benoit J
Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 79(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 1591971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Maturation of evoked potentials and visual preference in 6-45-day-old infants: effects of check size, visual acuity, and refractive error.
Harter MR; Deaton FK; Odom JV
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1977 May; 42(5):595-607. PubMed ID: 67021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Objective evaluation of binocular function using the pattern reversal visual evoked response. II. Effect of mean luminosity.
Katsumi O; Tanino T; Hirose T
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Apr; 64(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 3727960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [VECP (pattern threshold, amplitude, latency) in different light levels. A comparison between healthy eyes, organic and functional amblyopia eyes].
Niermann F; Dodt E
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 1855745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of check size on the pattern reversal visual evoked potential.
Kurita-Tashima S; Tobimatsu S; Nakayama-Hiromatsu M; Kato M
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 1713147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Confirmation of the validity of the psychophysical light scattering factor.
Whitaker D; Elliott DB; Steen R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 35(1):317-21. PubMed ID: 8300360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contrast visual testing in neurovisual diagnosis.
Lorance RW; Kaufman D; Wray SH; Mao C
Neurology; 1987 Jun; 37(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 3587642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retinocortical time exhibits spatial selectivity.
Rimmer S; Iragui V; Klauber MR; Katz B
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1989 Sep; 30(9):2045-9. PubMed ID: 2777522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of stimulus blocking, light scattering, and distortion on multifocal electroretinogram.
Arai M; Lopes de Faria JM; Hirose T
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1999; 43(6):481-9. PubMed ID: 10672876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs Snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus.
Katsumi O; Arai M; Wajima R; Denno S; Hirose T
Vision Res; 1996 Mar; 36(6):903-9. PubMed ID: 8736223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
