These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 811008)

  • 1. [Testing the sterilisation effect of autoclaves by means of biological indicators (author's transl)].
    Werner HP; Kindt R; Borneff J
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B; 1975 Jul; 160(4-5):458-72. PubMed ID: 811008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Tests of biological indicators in controling sterilisation processes of autoclaves (author's transl)].
    Holstein N
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B; 1975 Jul; 160(4-5):443-57. PubMed ID: 811007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Application of a new method for the calculation and description of the resistance of microbiological indicators. I. Testing of several common microbiological sterilization indicators (author's transl)].
    Spicher G; Peters J
    Zentralbl Bakteriol B; 1978 Aug; 167(1-2):63-82. PubMed ID: 362776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Viable spore counts in biological controls pre-sterilization.
    Brusca MI; Bernat MI; Turcot L; Nastri N; Nastri M; Rosa A
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 16673791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Suitability of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus stearothermophilus spores as test organism bioindicators for detecting superheating of steam].
    Spicher G; Peters J
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1997 Feb; 199(5):462-74. PubMed ID: 9376061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative thermoresistance of two biological indicators for monitoring steam autoclaves. 2. Comparison performed at 134 degrees C in a hospital prevacuum steam sterilizer.
    Skaug N; Kalager T
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1985 Apr; 93(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 4013742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ability of biological indicators to detect sterilization failures.
    Miller CH; Sheldrake MA
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 8054194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sterilization efficacy of a forced-air, dry heat sterilizer.
    Hohlt WF; Sheldrake MA; Miller CH
    Am J Dent; 1994 Aug; 7(4):220-2. PubMed ID: 7986440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Defective function of bioindicators for steam sterilization].
    Botzenhart K; Merkt-Kinzler M
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 May; 190(1-2):182-7. PubMed ID: 2393488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immobilized bacterial spores for use as bioindicators in the validation of thermal sterilization processes.
    Serp D; von Stockar U; Marison IW
    J Food Prot; 2002 Jul; 65(7):1134-41. PubMed ID: 12117247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sixteen years of experience with sterilization monitoring.
    Molinari JA; Gleason MJ; Merchant VA
    Compendium; 1994 Dec; 15(12):1422-4, 1426-8 passim; quiz 1432. PubMed ID: 7758029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Heat resistance of "Bacillus subtilis" and "Bacillus stearothermophilus" spores in ethylene glycol, propylene glycol and butylene glycol solutions. Criticism of the use of thermodynamic parameters (author's transl)].
    Cerf O; L'Haridon R; Hermier J
    Ann Microbiol (Paris); 1975 Jan; 126(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 811145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Biological and chemical indicators of thermal sterilization and their possible effect on its general concept].
    Horn H; Machmerth R; Witthauer J
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1976; 20(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 987099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring steam sterilization of surgical instruments: a dilemma.
    Perkins RE; Bodman HA; Kundsin RB; Walter CW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Aug; 42(2):383-7. PubMed ID: 6792986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of sterilization of endodontic instruments in artificial sponges.
    Vélez AE; Thomas DD; del Río CE
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 9487869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does incineration turn infectious waste aseptic?
    Kanemitsu K; Inden K; Kunishima H; Ueno K; Hatta M; Gunji Y; Watanabe I; Kaku M
    J Hosp Infect; 2005 Aug; 60(4):304-6. PubMed ID: 15963601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of and verification with biological indicators in sterilizers belonging to dentistry surgeons from San Luis Potosi, Mexico].
    Patiño-Marín N; Loyola-Rodríguez JP; Tovar-Reyes LF
    Salud Publica Mex; 2001; 43(5):455-8. PubMed ID: 11763693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [How many biological indicators have to be tested to get reliable information on their resistance?].
    Spicher G; Peters J
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1984 Aug; 179(4):365-80. PubMed ID: 6441383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of two or more microorganisms versus one microorganism in the carrier materials for biological indicators.
    Shintani H
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(4):387-90. PubMed ID: 9262838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Microbiological indicators of sterilization. General principles (author's transl)].
    Spicher G
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1973 Oct; 224(4):527-53. PubMed ID: 4150120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.