These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8110157)

  • 1. Comparisons between Hologic, Norland and Lunar dual-energy X-ray bone absorptiometers.
    Tothill P; Reid DM; Avenell A; Fenner JA
    Basic Life Sci; 1993; 60():385-8. PubMed ID: 8110157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Tothill P; Avenell A; Reid DM
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1210-7. PubMed ID: 7874420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Laskey MA; Flaxman ME; Barber RW; Trafford S; Hayball MP; Lyttle KD; Crisp AJ; Compston JE
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1023-9. PubMed ID: 1742583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
    Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femur.
    Tothill P; Fenner JA; Reid DM
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jun; 68(810):621-9. PubMed ID: 7627485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of in vivo body composition using two Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Oldroyd B; Milner R; Stewart SP; Smith AH; Westmacott CF; Smith MA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1998; 49(5-6):527-8. PubMed ID: 9569533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements.
    Tothill P; Avenell A; Love J; Reid DM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Nov; 48(11):781-94. PubMed ID: 7859696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry reference data for GE Lunar systems.
    Fan B; Shepherd JA; Levine MA; Steinberg D; Wacker W; Barden HS; Ergun D; Wu XP
    J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(3):344-77. PubMed ID: 24161789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():63-71. PubMed ID: 10865711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems for spinal bone mineral measurement.
    Lai KC; Goodsitt MM; Murano R; Chesnut CH
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1992 Mar; 50(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 1617493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A multinational study to develop universal standardization of whole-body bone density and composition using GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic DXA systems.
    Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Wu XP; Wacker WK; Ergun DL; Levine MA
    J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Oct; 27(10):2208-16. PubMed ID: 22623101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A total body phantom for use with Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Oldroyd B; Milner R; Smith AH; Smith MA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1998; 49(5-6):525-6. PubMed ID: 9606083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometers for Assessing Total and Regional Body Composition.
    Morrison SA; Petri RM; Hunter HL; Raju D; Gower B
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 26209017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the effect of different reference data on Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Laskey MA; Crisp AJ; Cole TJ; Compston JE
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Dec; 65(780):1124-9. PubMed ID: 1286422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Wilkinson S
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):166-76. PubMed ID: 11718390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
    Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode.
    Laskey MA; Lyttle KD; Flaxman ME; Barber RW
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 Jan; 46(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 1559506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
    Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
    Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.