These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8110235)
1. The effect of health coverage on use of cesarean section. Waszak SJ JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2434-5. PubMed ID: 8110235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of health coverage for uninsured pregnant women on maternal health and the use of cesarean section. Haas JS; Udvarhelyi S; Epstein AM JAMA; 1993 Jul; 270(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 8510298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the HealthChoice program on cesarean section and vaginal birth after C-section deliveries: a retrospective analysis. Misra A Matern Child Health J; 2008 Mar; 12(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 17549614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980. Gleicher N JAMA; 1984 Dec; 252(23):3273-6. PubMed ID: 6512931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate. Sachs BP; Kobelin C; Castro MA; Frigoletto F N Engl J Med; 1999 Jan; 340(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 9878648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Keeler EB; Brodie M Milbank Q; 1993; 71(3):365-404. PubMed ID: 8413067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Caesarean birth. Bonham DG N Z Med J; 1983 Mar; 96(728):205-6. PubMed ID: 6572825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. High Caesarean section rate in rural China: is it related to health insurance (New Co-operative Medical Scheme)? Long Q; Klemetti R; Wang Y; Tao F; Yan H; Hemminki E Soc Sci Med; 2012 Aug; 75(4):733-7. PubMed ID: 22595072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing primary cesarean delivery: can we prevent current and future morbidity and mortality? Caughey AB J Perinatol; 2009 Nov; 29(11):717-8. PubMed ID: 19861968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Geographic variation in cesarean delivery in the United States by payer. Henke RM; Wier LM; Marder WD; Friedman BS; Wong HS BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Nov; 14():387. PubMed ID: 25406813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The failure of financial incentive? The seemingly inexorable rise of cesarean section. Chen CS; Liu TC; Chen B; Lin CL Soc Sci Med; 2014 Jan; 101():47-51. PubMed ID: 24560223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches. Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Equalizing physician fees had little effect on cesarean rates. Keeler EB; Fok T Med Care Res Rev; 1996 Dec; 53(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 10162961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development statement on cesarean childbirth. A summary. J Reprod Med; 1981 Mar; 26(3):103-12. PubMed ID: 7230144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Financial incentives do not always work: an example of cesarean sections in Taiwan. Lo JC Health Policy; 2008 Oct; 88(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 18436331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]