These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8111812)

  • 1. The role of pharmacoeconomic guidelines for formulary approval: the Australian experience.
    Langley PC
    Clin Ther; 1993; 15(6):1154-76; discussion 1120. PubMed ID: 8111812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Managed care guidelines for the economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals.
    Langley PC; Martin RE
    Am J Manag Care; 1997 Jul; 3(7):1013-21. PubMed ID: 10173366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Focusing pharmacoeconomic activities: reimbursement or the drug life cycle?
    Langley PC
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004; 20(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 15006012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of pharmacoeconomics to formulary decision making in managed care organizations.
    Suh DC; Okpara IR; Agnese WB; Toscani M
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Feb; 8(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 11858228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pharmacoeconomic analysis in formulary decisions: an international perspective.
    Johnson JA; Bootman JL
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Oct; 51(20):2593-8. PubMed ID: 7847423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meeting the information needs of drug purchasers: the evolution of formulary submission guidelines.
    Langley PC
    Clin Ther; 1999 Apr; 21(4):768-87; discussion 767. PubMed ID: 10363741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A call for fairness in formulary decisions.
    Levinson W; Laupacis A
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Jan; 166(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 16401806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of clinical and economic evidence in dossier formulary submissions.
    Colmenero F; Sullivan SD; Palmer JA; Brauer CA; Bungay K; Watkins J; Neumann PJ
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 Jul; 13(7):401-7. PubMed ID: 17620035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicine reimbursement recommendations in Canada, Australia, and Scotland.
    Lexchin J; Mintzes B
    Am J Manag Care; 2008 Sep; 14(9):581-8. PubMed ID: 18778173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Format for Formulary Submissions: an evolving standard--a Foundation for Managed Care Pharmacy Task Force report.
    Fry RN; Avey SG; Sullivan SD
    Value Health; 2003; 6(5):505-21. PubMed ID: 14627057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Need for an improved submission process for listing drugs for reimbursement in Canadian provinces.
    West R; Borden EK; Collet JP; Rawson NS; Tonks RS
    Can J Clin Pharmacol; 2003; 10(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 14712327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Health economics evaluations are of great significance for Pharmaceutical Benefit Board's decisions].
    Persson U; Ramsberg J
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Oct 17-23; 104(42):3046-50. PubMed ID: 17985712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The case for a value-based formulary: striving for total lowest net cost.
    Weart W; Bauman GR
    Manag Care Interface; 2007 Apr; 20(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 17474330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using economic evaluations to make formulary coverage decisions. So much for guidelines.
    Anis AH; Gagnon Y
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 Jul; 18(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11010604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opinions regarding the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy dossier submission guidelines: results of a small survey of managed care organizations and pharmaceutical manufacturers.
    Nichol MB; Knight TK; Epstein J; Honda DH; Tretiak R
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 May; 13(4):360-71. PubMed ID: 17506602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drug approval processes in Australian Paediatric Hospitals.
    Sinha YK; Craig JC; Barclay P; Taitz J; South M; Coulthard K; Pearson C; Erickson S; Brien JE
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 Sep; 95(9):739-44. PubMed ID: 20584852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based decision-making within Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme.
    Lopert R
    Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Jul; 60():1-13. PubMed ID: 19639714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Update and evaluation of Australian guidelines. Government perspective.
    Mitchell A
    Med Care; 1996 Dec; 34(12 Suppl):DS216-25. PubMed ID: 8969329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharmacoeconomic series: Part 3. Applying pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life measures to the formulary management process.
    Skaer TL
    Hosp Formul; 1993 Jun; 28(6):577-84. PubMed ID: 10126586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating clinical outcomes and economic consequences into drug formulary decisions: a practical approach.
    Mather DB; Sullivan SD; Augenstein D; Fullerton DS; Atherly D
    Am J Manag Care; 1999 Mar; 5(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 10351024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.