These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8111813)
1. Pharmaceutical patents and some international trade issues: Canada, the United States, and NAFTA. Tancer RS Clin Ther; 1993; 15(6):1177-84; discussion 1120. PubMed ID: 8111813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the World Trade Organization TRIPS agreement on the pharmaceutical industry in Thailand. Supakankunti S; Janjaroen WS; Tangphao O; Ratanawijitrasin S; Kraipornsak P; Pradithavanij P Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(5):461-70. PubMed ID: 11417042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Has the implementation of the TRIPS Agreement in Latin America and the Caribbean produced intellectual property legislation that favours public health? Oliveira MA; Bermudez JA; Chaves GC; Velásquez G Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Nov; 82(11):815-21. PubMed ID: 15640916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact on access to medicines from TRIPS-Plus: a case study of Thai-US FTA. Kessomboon N; Limpananont J; Kulsomboon V; Maleewong U; Eksaengsri A; Paothong P Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2010 May; 41(3):667-77. PubMed ID: 20578557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pills, patents, and power: state creation of gray markets as a limit on patent rights. Ghosh S Fla J Int Law; 2002; 14(2):217-60. PubMed ID: 16526138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The North American Free Trade Agreement's effect on pharmaceutical patents: a bitter pill to swallow or a therapeutic solution? Silbermann JM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):607-36. PubMed ID: 8666736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. NAFTA and occupational health: a Canadian perspective. North American Free Trade Agreement. Walker C J Public Health Policy; 1997; 18(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 9360348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Within NAFTA 1.0: Implications for NAFTA 2.0 and for Democratic (Health) Governance in Canada. Mohamed FA; Chaufan C Int J Health Serv; 2020 Jul; 50(3):278-291. PubMed ID: 32019396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intellectual property rights and the Canadian pharmaceutical marketplace: where do we go from here? Lexchin J Int J Health Serv; 2005; 35(2):237-56. PubMed ID: 15932005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Intellectual property rights and right of access to medicines]. Velásquez G Med Trop (Mars); 2006 Dec; 66(6):526-8. PubMed ID: 17286013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. USMCA (NAFTA 2.0): tightening the constraints on the right to regulate for public health. Labonté R; Crosbie E; Gleeson D; McNamara C Global Health; 2019 May; 15(1):35. PubMed ID: 31088499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A consideration of the patentability of enantiomers in the pharmaceutical industry in the United States. Miller CP; Ullrich JW Chirality; 2008 Jun; 20(6):762-70. PubMed ID: 18200591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomedical patents and ethics: a Canadian solution. Gold ER McGill Law J; 2000 May; 45(2):413-35. PubMed ID: 12688288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sublicense or supply agreement? Supreme Court of Canada interpretation benefits generic pharmaceutical industry. Burshtein S Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 11758562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evolution of the international intellectual property rights system: patent protection for the pharmaceutical industry and access to medicines]. Chaves GC; Oliveira MA; Hasenclever L; de Melo LM Cad Saude Publica; 2007 Feb; 23(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 17221075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe. Fleck B; Baldock C Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 14526379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patents, pills and politics: the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Harvey K Aust Health Rev; 2004 Nov; 28(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 15527402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health policy or intellectual property policy? The fight over Bill C-91. Canadian Healthcare Association. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 1997; 10(2-3):vii-x. PubMed ID: 10169229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]