These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8112275)

  • 1. Ethnic differences in forefoot shape and the determination of shoe comfort.
    Hawes MR; Sovak D; Miyashita M; Kang SJ; Yoshihuku Y; Tanaka S
    Ergonomics; 1994 Jan; 37(1):187-96. PubMed ID: 8112275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between footwear comfort of shoe inserts and anthropometric and sensory factors.
    Mündermann A; Stefanyshyn DJ; Nigg BM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Nov; 33(11):1939-45. PubMed ID: 11689747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. COMPARING 3D FOOT SHAPE MODELS BETWEEN TAIWANESE AND JAPANESE FEMALES.
    Lee YC; Kouchi M; Mochimaru M; Wang MJ
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2015 Jun; 44(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 27281917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lower-extremity dynamics of walking in neuropathic diabetic patients who wear a forefoot-offloading shoe.
    Bus SA; Maas JC; Otterman NM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():21-26. PubMed ID: 28985487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of shoe sole hardness on plantar pressure and comfort in older people with forefoot pain.
    Lane TJ; Landorf KB; Bonanno DR; Raspovic A; Menz HB
    Gait Posture; 2014 Jan; 39(1):247-51. PubMed ID: 23968972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Running with a minimalist shoe increases plantar pressure in the forefoot region of healthy female runners.
    Bergstra SA; Kluitenberg B; Dekker R; Bredeweg SW; Postema K; Van den Heuvel ER; Hijmans JM; Sobhani S
    J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Jul; 18(4):463-8. PubMed ID: 25024135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plantar pressure relief in the diabetic foot using forefoot offloading shoes.
    Bus SA; van Deursen RW; Kanade RV; Wissink M; Manning EA; van Baal JG; Harding KG
    Gait Posture; 2009 Jun; 29(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 19217785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foot flare and foot axis.
    Goonetilleke RS; Luximon A
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):596-607. PubMed ID: 10774130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of eliminating leg length difference on plantar foot pressure distribution in patients wearing forefoot offloading shoe.
    Palmanovich E; Ayalon M; Sira DB; Nyska M; Hetsroni I
    Foot (Edinb); 2017 Dec; 33():39-43. PubMed ID: 29126041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of shoe inserts and heel height on foot pressure, impact force, and perceived comfort during walking.
    Yung-Hui L; Wei-Hsien H
    Appl Ergon; 2005 May; 36(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 15854579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical-grade footwear: the impact of fit and comfort.
    Hurst B; Branthwaite H; Greenhalgh A; Chockalingam N
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2017; 10():2. PubMed ID: 28070223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of shoes on the torsion and rearfoot motion in running.
    Stacoff A; Kälin X; Stüssi E
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1991 Apr; 23(4):482-90. PubMed ID: 1676133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of foot, leg and shoe characteristics on subjective comfort.
    Miller JE; Nigg BM; Liu W; Stefanyshyn DJ; Nurse MA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2000 Sep; 21(9):759-67. PubMed ID: 11023224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An examination of the relationship between foot length, foot breath, ball girth, height and weight of Turkish university students aged between 17 and 25.
    Anil A; Peker T; Turgut HB; Ulukent SC
    Anthropol Anz; 1997 Mar; 55(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 9161684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Forefoot relief with shoe inserts : Effects of different construction strategies].
    Baur H; Merz N; Muster A; Flückiger G; Hirschmüller A
    Z Rheumatol; 2018 Apr; 77(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 28687865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taiwanese adult foot shape classification using 3D scanning data.
    Lee YC; Wang MJ
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 25361465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How foot morphology changes influence shoe comfort and plantar pressure before and after long distance running?
    Mei Q; Gu Y; Sun D; Fernandez J
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30220725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in running mechanics using conventional shoelace versus elastic shoe cover.
    Hong Y; Wang L; Li JX; Zhou JH
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb; 29(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 21184340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative morphology of the human foot in a North American population.
    Hawes MR; Sovak D
    Ergonomics; 1994 Jul; 37(7):1213-26. PubMed ID: 8050406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.