154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8112794)
1. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system.
Clelland NL; Gilat A; McGlumphy EA; Brantley WA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 8112794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of abutment angulation on stress transfer for an implant.
Clelland NL; Gilat A
J Prosthodont; 1992 Sep; 1(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 1308216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of abutment angulation on strains and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques.
Brosh T; Pilo R; Sudai D
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Mar; 79(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 9553888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of strains produced in a bone simulant between conventional cast and resin-luted implant frameworks.
Clelland NL; van Putten MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 9425760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC; Sahin S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant design and interface force transfer. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis.
Cehreli M; Duyck J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 15008938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Narrow-diameter implants as terminal support for occlusal three-unit FPDs: a biomechanical analysis.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Dec; 24(6):513-9. PubMed ID: 15626314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 11951799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stress distribution after installation of fixed frameworks with marginal gaps over angled and parallel implants: a photoelastic analysis.
Markarian RA; Ueda C; Sendyk CL; Laganá DC; Souza RM
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 17362421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanics studies in dentistry: bioengineering applied in oral implantology.
Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; Gomes EA; Delben JA; dos Santos PH
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1173-7. PubMed ID: 19568186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of repeated manual disassembly and reassembly on the positional stability of various implant-abutment complexes: an experimental study.
Semper W; Heberer S; Mehrhof J; Schink T; Nelson K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 20209190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis.
Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
