154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8112794)
21. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication.
Maeda Y; Satoh T; Sogo M
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 33(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 16409521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of platform switching on strain developed around implants supporting mandibular overdenture.
Sabet ME; El-Korashy DI; El-Mahrouky NA
Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 19667825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Photoelastic stress analysis of natural teeth and three osseointegrated implant designs.
Deines DN; Eick JD; Cobb CM; Bowles CQ; Johnson CM
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):540-9. PubMed ID: 8181914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces.
Bernardes SR; de Araujo CA; Neto AJ; Simamoto Junior P; das Neves FD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):781-9. PubMed ID: 19865617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improving the fit of implant-supported superstructures using the spark erosion technique.
Eisenmann E; Mokabberi A; Walter MH; Freesmeyer WB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):810-8. PubMed ID: 15623055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
