110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8112795)
1. Comparison between implant-supported prostheses and teeth regarding passive threshold level.
Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 8112795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses.
Batista M; Bonachela W; Soares J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 18422982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study.
Davis DM; Packer ME; Watson RM
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):521-3. PubMed ID: 14651238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Passive tactile sensibility of teeth and osseointegrated dental implants in the maxilla.
Grieznis L; Apse P; Blumfelds L
Stomatologija; 2010; 12(3):80-6. PubMed ID: 21063137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system.
Romeo E; Lops D; Margutti E; Ghisolfi M; Chiapasco M; Vogel G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):247-59. PubMed ID: 15101597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
Walton TR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants.
Mericske-Stern R; Assal P; Mericske E; Bürgin W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 7615331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Preliminary study on tactile function of implant-supported single crowns].
Li N; Xie QF; Lin Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):458-61. PubMed ID: 24238409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Within-subject comparison between connected and nonconnected tooth-to-implant fixed partial prostheses: up to 14-year follow-up study.
Hosny M; Duyck J; van Steenberghe D; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 11203652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
Kinsel RP; Lin D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
Tartaglia GM; Testori T; Pallavera A; Marelli B; Sforza C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1081-8. PubMed ID: 18828826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impaired force control during food holding and biting in subjects with tooth- or implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Svensson KG; Trulsson M
J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Dec; 38(12):1137-46. PubMed ID: 22092509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years.
Kindberg H; Gunne J; Kronström M
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12066706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral tactile sensibility recorded in overdenture wearers with implants or natural roots: a comparative study. Part 2.
Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1994; 9(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 8150514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed and removable partial dentures.
Nickenig HJ; Spiekermann H; Wichmann M; Andreas SK; Eitner S
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 18546767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth.
Hämmerle CH; Wagner D; Brägger U; Lussi A; Karayiannis A; Joss A; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Jun; 6(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 7578785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
