These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8113572)

  • 1. Contrast media cost analysis--II.
    Olukotun AY
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Mar; 23(3):826-7; author reply 827-8. PubMed ID: 8113572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast media cost analysis--I.
    Zbrozek AS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Mar; 23(3):826; author reply 827-8. PubMed ID: 8113571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Net costs from three perspectives of using low versus high osmolality contrast medium in diagnostic angiocardiography.
    Powe NR; Davidoff AJ; Moore RD; Brinker JA; Anderson GF; Litt MR; Gopalan R; Graziano SL; Steinberg EP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 21(7):1701-9. PubMed ID: 8496540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of low- with high-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Identification of criteria for selective use.
    Matthai WH; Kussmaul WG; Krol J; Goin JE; Schwartz JS; Hirshfeld JW
    Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):291-301. PubMed ID: 8281660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast media markdown.
    Bieze J
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1996 Dec; 18(12):49-51, 54, 59. PubMed ID: 10163650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media.
    Benness GT
    Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):646-8. PubMed ID: 1943970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity.
    Drescher P; Madsen PO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Feb; 170(2):508-9. PubMed ID: 9456977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost of preventing adverse reactions to low-osmolar contrast agents.
    Millward SF
    Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):871-2. PubMed ID: 8184084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-osmolality contrast agents--who needs them?
    Hirshfeld JW
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):482-4. PubMed ID: 1732775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conversion to nonionics packs economic punch.
    Brumbaugh J; Young SW; Cohen D
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Jul; 13(7):99-104. PubMed ID: 10149725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
    Caro JJ; Trindade E; McGregor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Issues in selecting a contrast agent for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Hill JA
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Sep; 28 Suppl 4():S5-10. PubMed ID: 8225904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness and safety of selective use of low-osmolality contrast media.
    Michalson A; Franken EA; Smith W
    Acad Radiol; 1994 Sep; 1(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9419466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Applying cost-effectiveness analysis. The inside story.
    Eddy DM
    JAMA; 1992 Nov; 268(18):2575-82. PubMed ID: 1404827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Economics and efficacy of the use of contrast media].
    Seyferth W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):294-7. PubMed ID: 1821632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An economic analysis of strategies for the use of contrast media for diagnostic cardiac catheterization.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Foley RN; Detsky AS
    Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 7808208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Successful use of education and cost-based feedback strategies to reduce physician utilization of low-osmolality contrast agents in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Ziskind AA; Portelli J; Rodriguez S; Stafford JL; Herzog WR; Knox JG; Vogel RA
    Am J Cardiol; 1994 Jun; 73(16):1219-21. PubMed ID: 8203344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-osmolality contrast media in the 1990s: prices change.
    Palmisano SM
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):309; discussion 312-4. PubMed ID: 9114078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choice of contrast in left main coronary disease.
    Kussmaul WG
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 May; 44(1):102. PubMed ID: 9600538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.