These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8114494)

  • 1. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1276-85. PubMed ID: 8114494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. I. Age and lateral asymmetry effects.
    Divenyi PL; Haupt KM
    Ear Hear; 1997 Feb; 18(1):42-61. PubMed ID: 9058037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting the recognition of reverberant speech by elderly listeners.
    Halling DC; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 43(2):414-31. PubMed ID: 10757693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):662-70. PubMed ID: 8084196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing recognition of distorted speech using an equivalent signal-to-noise ratio index.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Jun; 38(3):706-13. PubMed ID: 7674661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
    Kortlang S; Mauermann M; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 40(2):423-31. PubMed ID: 9130210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Oct; 38(5):1150-6. PubMed ID: 8558883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency and temporal resolution in elderly listeners with good and poor word recognition.
    Phillips SL; Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ; Yeni-Komshian G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 43(1):217-28. PubMed ID: 10668664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal processing in the aging auditory system.
    Strouse A; Ashmead DH; Ohde RN; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2385-99. PubMed ID: 10491702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 6747116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of speech intelligibility index predictions for noise-masked young listeners with normal hearing and for elderly listeners with hearing impairment.
    Hargus SE; Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 7731214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Mackersie CL; Prida TL; Stiles D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 44(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 11218102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.