126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8114894)
1. Academy under fire over plans for new study of DNA statistics..
Macilwain C
Nature; 1994 Jan; 367(6459):101. PubMed ID: 8114894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Counterterrorism. U.S. science agencies begin to lend a hand.
Malakoff D; Koenig R
Science; 2001 Oct; 294(5543):761-2. PubMed ID: 11679639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Academy warns against slipping ethics.
Anderson C
Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5148):747. PubMed ID: 8303286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. National Research Council Board recommends restructuring of U.S. HLRW disposal program.
Ghosh PR
J Nucl Med; 1991 Jan; 32(1):15N-19N, 26N. PubMed ID: 1988621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Courts reject DNA fingerprinting, citing controversy after NAS report.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6394):349. PubMed ID: 1406941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Academy and presidential panel issue AIDS reports.
Ezzell C
Nature; 1988 Jun; 333(6173):485. PubMed ID: 3374590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comments on the statistical aspects of the NRC's report on DNA typing.
Devlin B; Risch N; Roeder K
J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 8113709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Institute of Medicine study supports state regulation of medical isotopes over NRC.
Silver S
J Nucl Med; 1996 Feb; 37(2):23N. PubMed ID: 8667050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pointing Fingers. DNA identification is called into question.
Beardsley T
Sci Am; 1992 Mar; 266(3):14-5. PubMed ID: 1585145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioterrorism. NAS censors report on agriculture threats.
Mervis J; Stokstad E
Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5589):1973-5. PubMed ID: 12242412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Science and government. Improving science and technology advice for Congress.
Morgan MG; Houghton A; Gibbons JH
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):1999-2000. PubMed ID: 11557862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Year 2000 issues.
Busby B
Health Phys; 1998 Dec; 75(6):570-1. PubMed ID: 9827502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Senate nod prompts fresh analysis of nuclear waste dump.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):262. PubMed ID: 12124583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Security worries stifle report on agricultural bioterror.
Gewin V
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6903):99. PubMed ID: 12226623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA fingerprinting. Academy approves, critics still cry foul.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6370):552. PubMed ID: 1560831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US energy department backs down on plan for A-bomb victim studies.
Macilwain C; Swinbanks D
Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6534):709. PubMed ID: 7596395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Joint effort: NRC wants teamwork for home-health regs.
Conn J
Mod Healthc; 2011 Jul; 41(30):12-3. PubMed ID: 22533269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Anthrax investigation. NAS study may fail to settle anthrax case.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5898):27. PubMed ID: 18832614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental health. Academy to mediate debate over rocket-fuel contaminants.
Renner R
Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5614):1829. PubMed ID: 12649455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ecology. 'Combat biology' on the Klamath.
Service RF
Science; 2003 Apr; 300(5616):36-9. PubMed ID: 12677035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
