155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8115208)
1. A comparison of diagnostic methods in adolescent girls with and without symptoms of Chlamydia urogenital infection.
Biro FM; Reising SF; Doughman JA; Kollar LM; Rosenthal SL
Pediatrics; 1994 Mar; 93(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 8115208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay and cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital infections].
Martínez A; Pinto E; Gaggero A; Arroyave R
Rev Med Chil; 1991 Feb; 119(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 1824159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Rapid diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis using a DNA probe in a population with low risk of infection].
Rosales M; Domínguez V; Bonacho I; Vidal X
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1992 Feb; 10(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 1643131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of chemiluminescent DNA probe to cell culture for the screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in a gynecology clinic population.
Mercer LJ; Robinson DC; Sahm DF; Lawrie MJ; Hajj SN
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jul; 76(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 2359557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of nucleic acid amplification tests and culture techniques in the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in victims of suspected child sexual abuse.
Kellogg ND; Baillargeon J; Lukefahr JL; Lawless K; Menard SW
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 17(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 15581779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection by use of DNA amplification.
Ostergaard L
APMIS Suppl; 1999; 89():5-36. PubMed ID: 10189834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type.
Chernesky M; Jang D; Sellors J; Castriciano S; Pickard L; Luinstra K; Mahony J
Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enzyme immunoassay in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in diverse patient groups.
Bakir TM; Hossain A; De-Silva S; Siddiqui A; Sengupta BS; el-Sheikh MM; Bakir AF
J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1989; 33(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 2671155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic Chilean men and with urethritis. Usefulness of first catch urine samples].
Romero J; Prado V; Gaete V; Martínez J; Pizarro E
Rev Med Chil; 1997 Oct; 125(10):1165-71. PubMed ID: 9609034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF
Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: comparison of agar-gel precipitin test and enzyme immunoassay.
Irokanulo EA; Akueshi CO; Makinde AA
Med Lab Sci; 1991 Apr; 48(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 1943537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR in genitourinary specimens from men and women attending an STD clinic.
Bhalla P; Baveja UK; Chawla R; Saini S; Khaki P; Bhalla K; Mahajan S; Reddy BS
J Commun Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18338709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
van Doornum GJ; Schouls LM; Pijl A; Cairo I; Buimer M; Bruisten S
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Roche COBAS Amplicor system for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Matthews-Greer JM; McRae KL; LaHaye EB; Jamison RM
Clin Lab Sci; 2001; 14(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 15625979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a modified sanitary napkin as a sample self-collection device for the detection of genital chlamydial infection in women.
Alary M; Poulin C; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Murray G; Gingras S; Aubé M; Morin C
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 39(7):2508-12. PubMed ID: 11427561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA, IDEIA and cell culture in the detection of urogenital chlamydial infection.
Bygdeman SM; Lidbrink P; Nahkiaisoja M; Parkhede U
Int J STD AIDS; 1990 May; 1(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 2083294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a pregnancy counseling clinic.
Binns B; Williams T; McDowell J; Brunham RC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Nov; 159(5):1144-9. PubMed ID: 3056001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Positive rate of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detected by the simultaneous sampling of the uterine cervix, uterine cavity and urinary tract and its relation to serum antibody titers].
Nagasawa I; Takada M; Ishi K
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Apr; 43(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 2066611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of BDProbeTec ET, LCx and PACE 2 assays for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
Pollara C; Terlenghi L; De Francesco MA; Gargiulo F; Perandin F; Manca N
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2003 Aug; 22(8):512-4. PubMed ID: 12884065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and aspects of the laboratory diagnostics.
Svensson LO; Mares I; Olsson SE; Nordström ML
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(7-8):587-90. PubMed ID: 1785275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
