140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8115620)
1. Focal hepatic masses: comparison of detection during arterial portography with MR imaging and CT.
Soyer P; Laissy JP; Sibert A; Blanc F; Belghiti J; Marmuse JP; Zeitoun G; Levesque M; Menu Y
Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):737-40. PubMed ID: 8115620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hepatic metastases: detection with multisection FLASH MR imaging during gadolinium chelate-enhanced arterial portography.
Soyer P; Laissy JP; Sibert A; Azencot M; Vissuzaine C; Marmuse JP; Achour E; Hercot O; Menu Y
Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):401-5. PubMed ID: 8210366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of focal hepatic masses: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography, and MR imaging.
Heiken JP; Weyman PJ; Lee JK; Balfe DM; Picus D; Brunt EM; Flye MW
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 2538862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography.
Senéterre E; Taourel P; Bouvier Y; Pradel J; Van Beers B; Daures JP; Pringot J; Mathieu D; Bruel JM
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 8756932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liver metastases: comparison of current MR techniques and spiral CT during arterial portography for detection in 20 surgically staged cases.
Semelka RC; Cance WG; Marcos HB; Mauro MA
Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 10540645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of CT during arterial portography and MR during arterial portography in the detection of liver metastases.
Hosch WP; Schmidt SM; Plaza S; Dechow C; Schmidt J; Ley S; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1502-11. PubMed ID: 16714637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of colorectal liver metastases: prospective comparison of unenhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T, dual-phase spiral CT, and spiral CT during arterial portography.
Lencioni R; Donati F; Cioni D; Paolicchi A; Cicorelli A; Bartolozzi C
MAGMA; 1998 Dec; 7(2):76-87. PubMed ID: 9951768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of CT, MRI and CT during arterial portography in the detection of malignant hepatic lesions.
Kehagias D; Metafa A; Hatziioannou A; Mourikis D; Vourtsi A; Prahalias A; Smyrniotis V; Gouliamos A; Vlahos L
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(35):1399-403. PubMed ID: 11100361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: comparative sensitivities of sonography, CT, and MR imaging.
Wernecke K; Rummeny E; Bongartz G; Vassallo P; Kivelitz D; Wiesmann W; Peters PE; Reers B; Reiser M; Pircher W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Oct; 157(4):731-9. PubMed ID: 1892027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging during arterial-portography (MR-AP) in the detection of hepatic tumor: comparison with CT-AP.
Kajiya Y; Nakajo M; Miyazono N; Kajiya Y; Fujiyoshi F; Ichinari N
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9495785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation.
Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Sugarbaker PH; Bernardino ME
Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 2662254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Homogeneous enhancement of hepatic parenchyma: MR imaging during arterial portography versus CT during arterial portography.
Fujita T; Honjo K; Ito K; Matsumoto T; Matsunaga N
Abdom Imaging; 1998; 23(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 9437063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pseudolesions at T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging after administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide: comparison with portal perfusion abnormalities at CT during arterial portography.
Scharf J; Hoffmann V; Lehnert T; Anselm H; Richter GM; Kauffmann GW
Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 9530300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incremental value of liver MR imaging in patients with potentially curable colorectal hepatic metastasis detected at CT: a prospective comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and a combination of both MR techniques.
Kim HJ; Lee SS; Byun JH; Kim JC; Yu CS; Park SH; Kim AY; Ha HK
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):712-22. PubMed ID: 25286324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of perfusion abnormalities on CTAP and immediate postintravenous gadolinium-enhanced gradient echo MRI.
Schlund JF; Semelka RC; Kettritz U; Weeks SM; Kahlenberg M; Cance WG
Abdom Imaging; 1996; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8672972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR portography: preliminary comparison with CT portography and conventional MR imaging.
Dravid VS; Shapiro MJ; Mitchell DG; Outwater EK; Piccoli CW; Feld RI; Wechsler RJ; Rosato FE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(6):767-71. PubMed ID: 7865935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Detection of malignant focal hepatic lesions. Comparison of ultrasonography, computerized tomography during arterial portography, delayed computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging].
Schneider F; Chapuis L; Gillet M; Leyvraz S; Schnyder P; Meuli R
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1999 Jan; 23(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 10219611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: comparison of intraoperative US and CT during arterial portography.
Soyer P; Levesque M; Elias D; Zeitoun G; Roche A
Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):541-4. PubMed ID: 1561365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT done 4-6 hr after CT arterial portography: value in detecting hepatic tumors and differentiating from other hepatic perfusion defects.
Nazarian LN; Wechsler RJ; Grady CK; Needleman L; Halpern EJ; Copit SE; Shapiro MJ; Rosato FE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):851-5. PubMed ID: 8092022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Focal lesions in cirrhotic liver: comparing MR imaging during arterial portography with Gd-enhanced dynamic MR imaging.
Yu JS; Kim KW; Lee JT; Yoo HS
Yonsei Med J; 2000 Oct; 41(5):546-55. PubMed ID: 11079613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
