BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8116434)

  • 1. Revision of total hip arthroplasty using the R.M. isoelastic prosthesis.
    Matricali GA; Thibaut H; Hendrickx M; Thibaut R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():374-6. PubMed ID: 8116434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
    Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.
    Schuh A; Werber S; Holzwarth U; Zeiler G
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jun; 124(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 15064958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket after a minimum follow-up of five years.
    Leclercq S; Benoit JY; de Rosa JP; Euvrard P; Leteurtre C; Girardin P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Dec; 94(8):e17-22. PubMed ID: 19070709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
    Masár J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Complications with the acetabular cup in the CLS total hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Deduch J; Hudecek F
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 11706722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ceramic endoprosthesis in total hip arthroplasty.
    Riska EB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Dec; (297):87-94. PubMed ID: 8242957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Results of the Evora dual mobility socket: five years follow-up].
    Leclercq S; Benoit JY; de Rosa JP; Euvrard P; Leteurtre C; Girardin P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Feb; 94(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18342028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term clinical results of cemented revision of primary cemented total hip arthroplasties.
    Diekerhof CH; Barnaart LF; Rozing PM
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2000 Oct; 66(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 11103490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Good long term results with a cemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium].
    Eingartner C; Ihm A; Maurer F; Volkmann R; Weise K; Weller S
    Unfallchirurg; 2002 Sep; 105(9):804-10. PubMed ID: 12232740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reconstitution of femoral bone stock in loosening of total hip prosthesis].
    Pierchon F; Migaud H; Duquennoy A
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 8237344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [An evaluation of the methods used for removal of components and cement in revision hip arthroplasty].
    Erdemli B
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2004; 38(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 15347918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total hip arthroplasty for acute femoral neck fractures using a cementless tapered femoral stem.
    Klein GR; Parvizi J; Vegari DN; Rothman RH; Purtill JJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Dec; 21(8):1134-40. PubMed ID: 17162172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Selection of the type in revision total hip replacement for failed hip arthroplasty].
    Zhang XB; Song JH; Wang KZ
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 18(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 15065415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.