These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8116703)

  • 1. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication.
    Notzon FC; Cnattingius S; Bergsjø P; Cole S; Taffel S; Irgens L; Daltveit AK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 8116703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.
    Gregory KD; Curtin SC; Taffel SM; Notzon FC
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Sep; 88(9):1384-7. PubMed ID: 9736883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate.
    Macara LM; Murphy KW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 171(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 7794300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indications for cesarean section in singleton pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.
    Sperling LS; Henriksen TB; Ulrichsen H; Hedegård M; Møller H; Hansen V; Ovlisen B; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Feb; 73(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 8116351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
    Mesleh RA; Asiri F; Al-Naim MF
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cesarean section rates and indications in Greece: data from a 24-year period in a teaching hospital.
    Tampakoudis P; Assimakopoulos E; Grimbizis G; Zafrakas M; Tampakoudis G; Mantalenakis S; Bontis J
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2004; 31(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 15672970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean section: changing incidence and indications.
    Gilstrap LC; Hauth JC; Toussaint S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 6694814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Indications for cesarean section].
    Stoll W
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1990 Feb; 120(8):255-9. PubMed ID: 2408143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.
    Stafford RS
    West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 2260286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. International collaborative effort (ICE) on birth weight, plurality, perinatal, and infant mortality. IV. Differences in obstetrical delivery practice: Norway, Scotland and the United States.
    Notzon FC; Bergsjø P; Cole S; Irgens LM; Daltveit AK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 1763609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cesarean birth: how to reduce the rate.
    Paul RH; Miller DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1903-7; discussion 1907-11. PubMed ID: 7778651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reversing the upward trend in the cesarean section rate.
    Peter J; Amir W; Eitan P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 Jun; 25(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 3609425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing the primary cesarean delivery rate.
    Branch DW; Silver RM
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 55(4):946-60. PubMed ID: 23090464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.
    Taffel SM; Placek PJ; Liss T
    Am J Public Health; 1987 Aug; 77(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 3605474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent trends in cesarean section rates in Ontario.
    Anderson GM; Lomas J
    CMAJ; 1989 Nov; 141(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 2804827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.