180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8116708)
1. Prognostic value of flow cytometric deoxyribonucleic acid index in endometrial carcinoma: comparison with other clinical-pathologic parameters.
Susini T; Rapi S; Savino L; Boddi V; Berti P; Massi G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):527-34. PubMed ID: 8116708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ten-year results of a prospective study on the prognostic role of ploidy in endometrial carcinoma: dNA aneuploidy identifies high-risk cases among the so-called 'low-risk' patients with well and moderately differentiated tumors.
Susini T; Amunni G; Molino C; Carriero C; Rapi S; Branconi F; Marchionni M; Taddei G; Scarselli G
Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):882-90. PubMed ID: 17262824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of DNA ploidy analysis in endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Jhala DN; Atkinson BF; Balsara GR; Hernandez E; Jhala NC
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2001 Oct; 5(5):267-73. PubMed ID: 11598854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in patients with stage II and stage III colon carcinoma: a prospective flow cytometric study.
Lanza G; Gafà R; Santini A; Maestri I; Dubini A; Gilli G; Cavazzini L
Cancer; 1998 Jan; 82(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 9428479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA content is an independent prognostic indicator in endometrial adenocarcinoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Zaino RJ; Davis AT; Ohlsson-Wilhelm BM; Brunetto VL
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1998 Oct; 17(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 9785131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flow cytometric deoxyribonucleic acid index: a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma.
Iversen OE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Oct; 155(4):770-6. PubMed ID: 3766632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prognostic evaluation of endometrial carcinoma by DNA content and histologic factors].
Shimizu K
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Apr; 47(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 7730696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive value of cell kinetics in endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Mariani L; Conti L; Antenucci A; Vercillo M; Atlante M; Gandolfo GM
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5B):3569-74. PubMed ID: 11131664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endometrial carcinomas--flow cytometric DNA content and S-phase values.
Jacobsen M; Jakobsen A; Nedergaard L; Andersen JE; Nielsen K
Pathol Res Pract; 1997; 193(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 9258954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective multicenter validation confirms the prognostic superiority of the endometrial carcinoma prognostic index in international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage 1 and 2 endometrial carcinoma.
Baak JP; Snijders W; van Diermen B; van Diest PJ; Diepenhorst FW; Benraadt J
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Nov; 21(22):4214-21. PubMed ID: 14615450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flow-cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Atypical mitoses are associated with DNA aneuploidy.
Genest DR; Sheets E; Lage JM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Sep; 102(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 8085558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA ploidy status: its impact on early-stage endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Goodman A; Bell DA; Rice LW
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Dec; 51(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 8112645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cell proliferation, measured as flow cytometric S-phase fraction, is a strong prognostic indicator in FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: a population-based study.
Green RW; Engblom S; Baldetorp B; Hartman L; Måsbäck A; Bjurberg M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Oct; 94(10):1064-73. PubMed ID: 26123703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cell cycle flow cytometric analysis in the diagnosis and management of colorectal carcinoma.
Sampedro A; Salas-Bustamante A; López-Artimez M; García-Muñíz JL; Urdiales G
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1999 Aug; 21(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 10560513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multivariate independent prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study in 181 patients: 10 years experience at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Mainz University.
Steiner E; Eicher O; Sagemüller J; Schmidt M; Pilch H; Tanner B; Hengstler JG; Hofmann M; Knapstein PG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 12657124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective analysis of DNA ploidy, proliferative index and epidermal growth factor receptor as prognostic factors for pretreated uterine cancer.
Nagai N; Oshita T; Fujii T; Kioka H; Katsube Y; Ohama K
Oncol Rep; 2000; 7(3):551-9. PubMed ID: 10767367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of clinicopathologic and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometric variables in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the modern era.
Clark PE; Veys JA; Eskridge MR; Woodruff RD; Hall MC
Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 16144666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DNA flow cytometric analysis of clinical stage I endometrial carcinomas with lymph node metastases.
Coleman RL; Schink JC; Miller DS; Bauer KD; August CZ; Rademaker AW; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8349159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary adenocarcinoma of the bladder: favorable prognostic significance of deoxyribonucleic acid diploidy measured by flow cytometry.
Song J; Farrow GM; Lieber MM
J Urol; 1990 Nov; 144(5):1115-8. PubMed ID: 2231882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy and S-phase fraction as prognostic parameters in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a prospective study.
Kaern J; Tropé CG; Kristensen GB; Tveit KM; Pettersen EO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):479-87. PubMed ID: 8116701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
