These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8116727)

  • 1. Clinical experience with the Hewlett-Packard M-1350A fetal monitor: correlation of Doppler-detected fetal body movements with fetal heart rate parameters and perinatal outcome.
    Devoe L; Boehm F; Paul R; Frigoletto F; Penso C; Goldenberg R; Rayburn W; Smith C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 170(2):650-5. PubMed ID: 8116727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of fetal body movement recorded by the Hewlett-Packard M-1350-A fetal monitor.
    Melendez TD; Rayburn WF; Smith CV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 167(3):700-2. PubMed ID: 1530026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of maternal ambulation on the nonstress test.
    Devoe LD; Arthur M; Searle N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 157(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 3618665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?
    Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Course and predictive value of fetal heart rate parameters.
    Arabin B; Lorenz U; Rüttgers H; Kubli F
    Am J Perinatol; 1988 Jul; 5(3):272-7. PubMed ID: 3289557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural network prediction of nonstress test results: how often should we perform nonstress tests?
    Devoe LD; Carlton E; Prescott P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1128-31. PubMed ID: 7485305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The diagnostic values of concurrent nonstress testing, amniotic fluid measurement, and Doppler velocimetry in screening a general high-risk population.
    Devoe LD; Gardner P; Dear C; Castillo RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 163(3):1040-7; discussion 1047-8. PubMed ID: 2206056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Invention of ultrasonic Doppler fetal actocardiograph and continuous recording of fetal movements.
    Maeda K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 26711552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An active management approach to the postdate fetus with a reactive nonstress test and fetal heart rate decelerations.
    Small ML; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 70(4):636-40. PubMed ID: 3627631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of fetal movements as an early labour admission test in low-risk pregnancies.
    Farrell T; Seaton L; Owen P
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 25(1-2):23-5. PubMed ID: 9743874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antepartum surveillance in diabetic pregnancies: predictors of fetal distress in labor.
    Kjos SL; Leung A; Henry OA; Victor MR; Paul RH; Medearis AL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 173(5):1532-9. PubMed ID: 7503197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuing role of the nonstress test in the management of postdates pregnancy.
    Phelan JP; Platt LD; Yeh SY; Trujillo M; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 6493655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic components of the nonreactive nonstress test.
    Ingardia CJ; Cetrulo CL; Knuppel RA; Kappy KA; Scerbo JC; Lake M; Aumann G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 7422169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of the nonreactive nonstress test in evaluating neonatal outcome.
    Bhide A; Bhattacharya MS
    J Postgrad Med; 1990 Apr; 36(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 2097363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The DopFet system: a new ultrasonic Doppler system for monitoring and characterization of fetal movement.
    Karlsson B; Foulquière K; Kaluzynski K; Tranquart F; Fignon A; Pourcelot D; Pourcelot L; Berson M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 26(7):1117-24. PubMed ID: 11053746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of vibratory acoustic stimulation on baseline fetal heart rate in term pregnancy.
    Devoe LD; Gardner P; Arnold P; Searle N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 160(5 Pt 1):1086-90. PubMed ID: 2729385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential nonstress testing with use of each fetus as its own control.
    Devoe LD; Castillo R; McKenzie J; Searle N; Robinson B; Davis H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 154(4):931-6. PubMed ID: 3754387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The preterm nonstress test: effects of gestational age and length of study.
    Castillo RA; Devoe LD; Arthur M; Searle N; Metheny WP; Ruedrich DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jan; 160(1):172-5. PubMed ID: 2912079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Actifetus system: a multidoppler sensor system for monitoring fetal movements.
    Kribèche A; Tranquart F; Kouame D; Pourcelot L
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 17276580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of the Hewlett-Packard actograph in detecting fetal movements.
    de Wit AC; Nijhuis JG
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Aug; 22(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 12905509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.