These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8116727)

  • 21. Antepartum fetal surveillance in the patient with decreased fetal movement.
    Ahn MO; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Jacobs N; Rutherford SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 157(4 Pt 1):860-4. PubMed ID: 3314515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new modality in nonstress testing: evaluation of beat-to-beat fetal heart rate variability.
    Lauersen NH; Wilson KH; Bilek A; Rao VS; Kurkulos M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Nov; 141(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 7294079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Antepartum nonstress fetal heart rate monitoring: systematic analysis of baseline patterns and decelerations as an adjunct to reactivity in the prediction of fetal risks.
    Brioschi PA; Extermann P; Terracina D; Weil C; Mao WT; Beguin F
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):633-7. PubMed ID: 4061531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Population differences affect the interpretation of fetal nonstress test results.
    Johnson TR; Paine LL; Strobino DM; Witter FR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 179(3 Pt 1):779-83. PubMed ID: 9757989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of fetal well-being using the nonstress test in the home setting.
    Naef RW; Morrison JC; Washburne JF; McLaughlin BN; Perry KG; Roberts WE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):424-6. PubMed ID: 8058242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A controlled trial of self-nonstress test versus assisted nonstress test in the evaluation of fetal well-being.
    Reece EA; Hagay Z; Garofalo J; Hobbins JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 166(2):489-92. PubMed ID: 1536216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Coupling of fetal movement and fetal heart rate accelerations as an indicator of fetal health.
    Baser I; Johnson TR; Paine LL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 80(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 1603499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of maternal cocaine use on the fetus: changes in antepartum fetal heart rate tracings.
    Tabor BL; Soffici AR; Smith-Wallace T; Yonekura ML
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 165(5 Pt 1):1278-81. PubMed ID: 1957845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nonstress test prediction of fetal status.
    Gandhi J; Gugliucci CL
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Feb; 27(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 7097665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer-assisted assessment of the fetal biophysical profile.
    Devoe LD; Searle N; Searle J; Phillips M; Castillo RA; Saad S; Sherline DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 153(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 3901767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The kinetocardiotocogram--initial clinical experiences using the kinetocardiotocogram].
    Schmidt W; Gnirs J
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Jun; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 1889727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correlation of Doppler-detected fetal body movements with fetal heart rate parameters and perinatal outcome: a reevaluation.
    Gonser M; Marzusch K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 172(5):1635-6. PubMed ID: 7619156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multidimensional Ultrasound Doppler Signal Analysis for Fetal Activity Monitoring.
    Ribes S; Girault JM; Perrotin F; Kouamé D
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 41(12):3172-81. PubMed ID: 26365925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new computerized analysis to precisely evaluate heart rate variability during the nonstress test.
    Kobayashi H; Yoshida A; Kobayashi M; Hamada T; Noguchi Y; Yamada T
    Am J Perinatol; 2003 Feb; 20(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 12660912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Original report. Fetal cardiographic monitoring during 1.5-T MR imaging.
    Michel SC; Rake A; Keller TM; Huch R; König V; Seifert B; Marincek B; Kubik-Huch RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):1159-64. PubMed ID: 12646475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The predictive value of fetal heart rate monitoring: a retrospective analysis of 2165 high-risk pregnancies.
    Ocak V; Demirkíran F; Sen C; Colgar U; Oçer F; Kilavuz O; Uras Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Mar; 44(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 1587368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time quantified detection of fetal movements using a new fetal movement algorithm.
    Lowery CL; Russell WA; Baggot PJ; Wilson JD; Walls RC; Bentz LS; Murphy P
    Am J Perinatol; 1997 Jan; 14(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 9259889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Combined electronic fetal heart rate and fetal movement monitor--a preliminary report.
    Schwöbel E; Fallenstein F; Huch R; Huch A; Rooth G
    J Perinat Med; 1987; 15(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 3309248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.