146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8117394)
1. [A comparison of BRILA-MUG and lauryl sulfate-MUG bouillon as detection media for total and fecal coliform bacteria in bathing waters in conformity with the Economic Community Guideline 76/160 EWG].
Müller HE; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Holländer R; Köppe FG; von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1993 Nov; 195(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 8117394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [MUG-lauryl sulfate bouillon--an optimal medium for the detection of total coliforms and fecal coliform bacteria in relation to hygienic evaluation of bathing waters according to the European Community Guideline 76/160 EWG].
Schindler PR
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 Apr; 191(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 1872943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].
Havemeister G; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; Von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Growth behavior of Enterobacteriaceae in BRILA-MUG-broth and in different modifications of broth].
Müller HE; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Havemeister G; Heinemeyer EA; von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Aug; 193(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 1382430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria for quality control of bathing waters using the EC guideline 76/160 most probable number and BRILA-MUG broth].
Müller HE; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Havemeister G; Heinemeyer EA; Von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 May; 189(6):543-53. PubMed ID: 2383351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of BGB-MUG and LSTB-MUG in microbiological surveillance of recreational waters.
Höller C; Havemeister G; Gundermann KO
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1995 Dec; 198(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 9353533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative bacteriologic examinations of bathing water in Szczecin province using methods from northern regions of the Federal Republic of Germany and in the Polish State Hygienic Station].
Toruń D; Dziurzyńska F
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1993; 44(2-3):221-5. PubMed ID: 8016545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of totalcoliform and faecalcoliform bacteria from bathing water with FLUOROCULT-BRILA-broth.
Havemeister G
Acta Microbiol Hung; 1991; 38(3-4):257-64. PubMed ID: 1817422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative performance of Colisure.
McFeters GA; Broadaway SC; Pyle BH; Pickett M; Egozy Y
J Am Water Works Assoc; 1997 Sep; 89(9):112-20. PubMed ID: 11540632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of MUG-supplemented media for the detection of E. coli in recreational water surveillance.
Neidhardt S; Havemeister G; Höller C; Gundermann KO
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1995 Dec; 198(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 9353534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative study of the detection of E. coli after time in seawater with partially modified standard media].
Kolbeck K; Richter KD; Heinemeyer EA
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Oct; 193(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 1457033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Reactions of different Enterobacteriaceae and Vibrionaceae species in BRILA-MUG (Fluorocult) bouillion].
Aleksić S; Bockemühl J; Schulze G; Havemeister G; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 Oct; 190(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 2080970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A combined chromogenic-fluorogenic medium for the simultaneous detection of coliform groups and E. coli in water].
Manafi M; Kneifel W
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1989 Dec; 189(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 2697207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fluorogenic and conventional membrane filter media for enumerating coliform bacteria.
Cenci G; De Bartolomeo A; Caldini G
Microbios; 1993; 76(306):47-54. PubMed ID: 8264433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Bathing water inspection following the guideline of the council of the European Economic Community from December 8, 1975, concerning the quality of bathing water. Studies of bathing water upon microbiological parameter change of the recommendations of the ad hoc working group of coastal lands of 1991. Position on 23 April 1993].
Havemeister G
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1993 Nov; 195(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 8117386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of media for enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in non-disinfected water.
Pitkänen T; Paakkari P; Miettinen IT; Heinonen-Tanski H; Paulin L; Hänninen ML
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 17150268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distribution of indicator bacteria in Canyon Lake, California.
Davis K; Anderson MA; Yates MV
Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(7):1277-88. PubMed ID: 15862327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The occurrence of aeromonads in a drinking water supply system].
Stelzer W; Jacob J; Feuerpfeil I; Schulze E
Zentralbl Mikrobiol; 1992; 147(3-4):231-5. PubMed ID: 1609555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of coliform genera recovered from water using different technologies.
Fricker CR; Eldred BJ
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 49(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 19874482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relation between Aeromonas and faecal coliforms in fresh waters.
Araujo RM; Arribas RM; Lucena F; Pares R
J Appl Bacteriol; 1989 Aug; 67(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 2553653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
