124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8117908)
1. Global tests for multiple binary outcomes.
Lefkopoulou M; Ryan L
Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):975-88. PubMed ID: 8117908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using historical controls in the analysis of developmental toxicity data.
Ryan L
Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 8117906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design of multiple binary outcome studies with intentionally missing data.
Williams P; Ryan L
Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1498-514. PubMed ID: 8962465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multivariate extensions of McNemar's test.
Klingenberg B; Agresti A
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):921-8. PubMed ID: 16984337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative risk assessment for developmental toxicity.
Ryan L
Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 1581483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for analyzing multivariate binary data, with association between outcomes of interest.
Molenberghs G; Ritter LL
Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1121-33. PubMed ID: 8924574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compatible simultaneous lower confidence bounds for the Holm procedure and other Bonferroni-based closed tests.
Strassburger K; Bretz F
Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4914-27. PubMed ID: 18618415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple contrast tests in the presence of heteroscedasticity.
Hasler M; Hothorn LA
Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):793-800. PubMed ID: 18932141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Approximate simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple contrasts of binomial proportions.
Schaarschmidt F; Sill M; Hothorn LA
Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):782-92. PubMed ID: 18932137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation efficiency and tests of covariate effects with clustered binary data.
Neuhaus JM
Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):989-96. PubMed ID: 8117909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
Carr GJ; Portier CJ
Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A shared response model for clustered binary data in developmental toxicity studies.
Pang Z; Kuk AY
Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1076-84. PubMed ID: 16401281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An extension of Yule's Q to multivariate binary data.
Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice G
Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):847-52. PubMed ID: 7981405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of odds ratio or relative risk to measure a treatment effect in clinical trials with multiple correlated binary outcomes: data from the NINDS t-PA stroke trial.
Lu M; Tilley BC;
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1891-901. PubMed ID: 11427947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting power of tests for multiple binary outcomes.
Mascha EJ; Imrey PB
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2890-904. PubMed ID: 20862669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two approaches to analyzing correlated binary data in developmental toxicity studies.
Ten Have TR; Hartzel T
Teratology; 1995 Nov; 52(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 8838250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scaled marginal models for multiple continuous outcomes.
Roy J; Lin X; Ryan LM
Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):371-83. PubMed ID: 12925505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significance testing for correlated binary outcome data.
Rosner B; Milton RC
Biometrics; 1988 Jun; 44(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 3390508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints.
O'Brien PC
Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):1079-87. PubMed ID: 6534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
