95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8118050)
21. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A method of selecting the best implant prosthesis design option using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kregzde M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(6):662-73. PubMed ID: 8181829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Relationship between implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and bone loss during early healing period.
Yang SM; Shin SY; Kye SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e12-9. PubMed ID: 18230372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics.
Grunder U; Gracis S; Capelli M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Apr; 25(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 15839587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Treatment planning of implants in posterior quadrants.
Jivraj S; Chee W
Br Dent J; 2006 Jul; 201(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 16829878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preventive and interceptive prosthodontics: bridging the gap between restorative and implant dentistry. Interview.
Davliakos J
Dent Implantol Update; 2003 Nov; 14(11):81-7. PubMed ID: 14705554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts.
Gross MD
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53 Suppl 1():S60-8. PubMed ID: 18498587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Occlusal stability in implant prosthodontics -- clinical factors to consider before implant placement.
Saba S
J Can Dent Assoc; 2001 Oct; 67(9):522-6. PubMed ID: 11597344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Issues and considerations in dental implant occlusion: what do we know, and what do we need to find out?
Stanford CM
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2005 Apr; 33(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 15915884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Scalloped implant designs enhance interproximal bone levels.
McAllister BS
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Feb; 27(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17370657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Principles of occlusion in implant dentistry. Interview.
Ky KE
Dent Implantol Update; 2006 May; 17(5):33-8. PubMed ID: 16703790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Do long-term followed-up Branemark implants commonly show evidence of pathological bone breakdown? A review based on recently published data.
Jemt T; Albrektsson T
Periodontol 2000; 2008; 47():133-42. PubMed ID: 18412578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Implant screw mechanics.
McGlumphy EA; Mendel DA; Holloway JA
Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9421671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Peri-implantitis affecting the upper central incisor.
O'Flaherty E
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2010; 56(2):67. PubMed ID: 20480614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year.
Shin YK; Han CH; Heo SJ; Kim S; Chun HJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 17066642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of load transfer by implant abutments of various diameters.
Tuncelli B; Poyrazoglu E; Köylüoglu AM; Tezcan S
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1997 Jun; 5(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9487816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bone levels using different methods of abutment connection.
Otto M; Gluckman H
SADJ; 2008 Mar; 63(2):118, 120. PubMed ID: 18561814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses.
Weinberg LA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8468083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments.
Lachmann S; Laval JY; Jäger B; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Groten M; Weber H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 16441788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
