These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8118132)

  • 21. Webster and women's equality.
    Johnsen D; Wilder MJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):178-84. PubMed ID: 2603859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Oct; 321(17):1200-3. PubMed ID: 2677728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Roe v. Wade and the history of abortion regulation.
    Linton PB
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):227-33. PubMed ID: 2690604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
    Benshoof J
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rewriting Roe v. Wade.
    Regan DH
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1569-646. PubMed ID: 10245966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework.
    Mangel CP
    Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abortion: the new debate.
    Callahan D
    Prim Care; 1986 Jun; 13(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 3523563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abortion: in search of a constitutional doctrine (Part 1).
    Leyshon DJ
    Med Law; 1991; 10(2):155-83. PubMed ID: 1886465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abortion and the law: the Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion.
    Marsh FH
    Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():107-23. PubMed ID: 12348324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):651-4. PubMed ID: 1640971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Court edges away from Roe v. Wade.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 2792338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition.
    Manninen BA
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):33-46. PubMed ID: 21161841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. 25 years after Roe: new technological parameters for an old debate.
    Cohen SA
    Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Feb; 1(1):5, 12. PubMed ID: 12321448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sara Weddington on Roe v. Wade. Interview by Lee Stockdale.
    Weddington S
    Health Matrix; 1989; 7(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 10294685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The fight over Roe v. Wade: the Webster briefs.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 2759219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Defining minors' abortion rights.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1988; 13(5):321. PubMed ID: 3139955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What the U.S. Constitution says. The law and abortion.
    Liben P
    Freedom Rev; 1995; 26(5):20-1. PubMed ID: 12346849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Roe v. Wade. Jane's perspective.
    Kaplan L
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):27-8. PubMed ID: 12178883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.