BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8118726)

  • 1. Objective data and quality assurance programs. Current and future trends.
    Rafkin HS; Hoyt JW
    Crit Care Clin; 1994 Jan; 10(1):157-77. PubMed ID: 8118726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The case against using the APACHE system to predict intensive care unit outcome in trauma patients.
    Vassar MJ; Holcroft JW
    Crit Care Clin; 1994 Jan; 10(1):117-26; discussion 127-34. PubMed ID: 8118723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993-2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database.
    Moran JL; Bristow P; Solomon PJ; George C; Hart GK;
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Jan; 36(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 18090383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Building a continuous multicenter infection surveillance system in the intensive care unit: findings from the initial data set of 9,493 patients from 71 Italian intensive care units.
    Malacarne P; Langer M; Nascimben E; Moro ML; Giudici D; Lampati L; Bertolini G;
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):1105-13. PubMed ID: 18379234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a multiple-site intensive care unit telemedicine program on clinical and economic outcomes: an alternative paradigm for intensivist staffing.
    Breslow MJ; Rosenfeld BA; Doerfler M; Burke G; Yates G; Stone DJ; Tomaszewicz P; Hochman R; Plocher DW
    Crit Care Med; 2004 Jan; 32(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 14707557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of intensive care unit severity scoring systems in reimbursement strategies.
    Lockrem JD; Sirio CA
    Crit Care Clin; 1994 Jan; 10(1):145-56. PubMed ID: 8118725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Severity-of-illness scoring systems and models: neurological and neurosurgical intensive care units.
    Murthy JM; Meena AK; Kumar SR
    Neurol India; 2001 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S91-4. PubMed ID: 11889480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensive care telemedicine: evaluating a model for proactive remote monitoring and intervention in the critical care setting.
    Groves RH; Holcomb BW; Smith ML
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 131():131-46. PubMed ID: 18305328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Case mix, outcome and activity for patients admitted to intensive care units requiring chronic renal dialysis: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database.
    Hutchison CA; Crowe AV; Stevens PE; Harrison DA; Lipkin GW
    Crit Care; 2007; 11(2):R50. PubMed ID: 17451605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cleveland Health Quality Choice (CHQC)--an ongoing collaborative, community-based outcomes assessment program.
    Sirio CA; Angus DC; Rosenthal GE
    New Horiz; 1994 Aug; 2(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 8087590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic factors and utility of scoring systems in patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit and required a mechanical ventilator.
    Nishida K; Palalay MP
    Hawaii Med J; 2008 Oct; 67(10):264-9. PubMed ID: 19097551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can outcome prediction data change patient outcomes and organizational outcomes?
    Rothen HU; Takala J
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2008 Oct; 14(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 18787442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Customized prediction models based on APACHE II and SAPS II scores in patients with prolonged length of stay in the ICU.
    Suistomaa M; Niskanen M; Kari A; Hynynen M; Takala J
    Intensive Care Med; 2002 Apr; 28(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 11967604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The organization of intensive care unit physician services.
    Pronovost PJ; Thompson DA; Holzmueller CG; Dorman T; Morlock LL
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):2256-61. PubMed ID: 17717492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intensive care unit length of stay: Benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV.
    Zimmerman JE; Kramer AA; McNair DS; Malila FM; Shaffer VL
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Oct; 34(10):2517-29. PubMed ID: 16932234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The case for using objective scoring systems to predict intensive care unit outcome.
    Watts CM; Knaus WA
    Crit Care Clin; 1994 Jan; 10(1):73-89; discussion 91-2. PubMed ID: 8118734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pay for performance in the intensive care unit--opportunity or threat?
    Khanduja K; Scales DC; Adhikari NK
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Mar; 37(3):852-8. PubMed ID: 19237887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Location of patients before transfer to a tertiary care intensive care unit: impact on outcome.
    Gerber DR; Schorr C; Ahmed I; Dellinger RP; Parrillo J
    J Crit Care; 2009 Mar; 24(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 19272546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intensive care at two teaching hospitals: an organizational case study.
    Zimmerman JE; Rousseau DM; Duffy J; Devers K; Gillies RR; Wagner DP; Draper EA; Shortell SM; Knaus WA
    Am J Crit Care; 1994 Mar; 3(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 8167773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality assurance in an adult intensive care unit, Eastern region, Saudi Arabia.
    Iqbal M; Rehmani R; Venter J; Alaithan AM
    Saudi Med J; 2007 Mar; 28(3):408-11. PubMed ID: 17334470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.