These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8118768)

  • 1. The admissions process of a bachelor of science in nursing program: initial reliability and validity of the personal interview.
    Carpio B; Brown B
    Can J Nurs Res; 1993; 25(3):41-52. PubMed ID: 8118768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditional reliability of admissions interview ratings: extreme ratings are the most informative.
    Stansfield RB; Kreiter CD
    Med Educ; 2007 Jan; 41(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 17209890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical student selection: choice of a semi-structured panel interview or an unstructured one-on-one interview.
    Ann Courneya C; Wright K; Frinton V; Mak E; Schulzer M; Pachev G
    Med Teach; 2005 Sep; 27(6):499-503. PubMed ID: 16199355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Students versus faculty members as admissions interviewers: comparisons of ratings data and admissions decisions.
    Eddins-Folensbee FF; Harris TB; Miller-Wasik M; Thompson B
    Acad Med; 2012 Apr; 87(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 22361799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care.
    Morriss R; Leese M; Chatwin J; Baldwin D;
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Dec; 111(2-3):204-13. PubMed ID: 18374987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.
    Lemay JF; Lockyer JM; Collin VT; Brownell AK
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 17518837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applicant selection procedures: a more objective approach to the interview process.
    Vojir CP; Bronstein RA
    J Allied Health; 1983 May; 12(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 6874559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global clinical performance rating, reliability and validity in an undergraduate clerkship.
    Daelmans HE; van der Hem-Stokroos HH; Hoogenboom RJ; Scherpbier AJ; Stehouwer CD; van der Vleuten CP
    Neth J Med; 2005; 63(7):279-84. PubMed ID: 16093582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can an interview score sheet assist with student selection onto the bachelor of science/diploma of higher education (adult) nursing programme? Findings from a pilot study.
    McCallum J; Donaldson JH; Lafferty P
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Oct; 26(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 16962688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified personal interviews: resurrecting reliable personal interviews for admissions?
    Hanson MD; Kulasegaram KM; Woods NN; Fechtig L; Anderson G
    Acad Med; 2012 Oct; 87(10):1330-4. PubMed ID: 22914517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A structured interview for dental school admissions.
    Graham JW; Boyd MA
    J Dent Educ; 1982 Feb; 46(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 6948867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability].
    Schlote A; Richter M; Wunderlich MT; Poppendick U; Möller C; Wallesch CW
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2008 Feb; 47(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 18247269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective analysis of the behavioral interview and other preadmission variables to predict licensure examination outcomes in physical therapy.
    Hollman JH; Rindflesch AB; Youdas JW; Krause DA; Hellyer NJ; Kinlaw D
    J Allied Health; 2008; 37(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18630785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Level of intrateam agreement on candidate scores in a structured interview process.
    Youdas JW; Bogard CL; Suman VJ
    J Allied Health; 1996; 25(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 9119732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.
    Hecker K; Donnon T; Fuentealba C; Hall D; Illanes O; Morck DW; Muelling C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 19625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing a valid and reliable Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance scale.
    Cheraghi F; Hassani P; Yaghmaei F; Alavi-Majed H
    Int Nurs Rev; 2009 Jun; 56(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 19646171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalisability of a composite student selection programme.
    O'Neill LD; Korsholm L; Wallstedt B; Eika B; Hartvigsen J
    Med Educ; 2009 Jan; 43(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 19140998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use?
    Vatnaland T; Vatnaland J; Friis S; Opjordsmoen S
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2007 Apr; 115(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 17355524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school.
    Roberts C; Walton M; Rothnie I; Crossley J; Lyon P; Kumar K; Tiller D
    Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 42(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 18338992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.