These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8119001)

  • 1. Porous-coated total hip replacement.
    Engh CA; Hooten JP; Zettl-Schaffer KF; Ghaffarpour M; McGovern TF; Macalino GE; Zicat BA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):89-96. PubMed ID: 8119001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems.
    Moreland JR; Bernstein ML
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):141-50. PubMed ID: 7554623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extensively coated femoral components in young patients.
    Kronick JL; Barba ML; Paprosky WG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):263-74. PubMed ID: 9372777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial.
    Tanzer M; Kantor S; Rosenthall L; Bobyn JD
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Aug; 16(5):552-8. PubMed ID: 11503113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of hydroxyapatite coating in resisting wear particle migration and osteolysis around acetabular components.
    Coathup MJ; Blackburn J; Goodship AE; Cunningham JL; Smith T; Blunn GW
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(19):4161-9. PubMed ID: 15664643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
    Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
    Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
    Kim YH; Kim JS
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty mean 9-year results.
    Surdam JW; Archibeck MJ; Schultz SC; Junick DW; White RE
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 17275634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
    Behairy YM; Harris WH
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision of loose cementless femoral prostheses to larger porous coated components.
    Engh CA; Culpepper WJ; Kassapidis E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Feb; (347):168-78. PubMed ID: 9520886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation.
    Nagi ON; Kumar S; Aggarwal S
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Jan; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16570896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of in vivo cementless acetabular fixation.
    Tooke SM; Nugent PJ; Chotivichit A; Goodman W; Kabo JM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):253-60. PubMed ID: 3416531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cortical bone density of the proximal femur following cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    McGovern TF; Engh CA; Zettl-Schaffer K; Hooten JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Sep; (306):145-54. PubMed ID: 8070187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years.
    Scott DF; Jaffe WL
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 8792250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of porous coating level on proximal femoral remodeling. A postmortem analysis.
    McAuley JP; Sychterz CJ; Engh CA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Feb; (371):146-53. PubMed ID: 10693561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.