BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8119484)

  • 1. A comparison of children's performance on two recognition memory tasks: delayed nonmatch-to-sample versus visual paired-comparison.
    Overman WH; Bachevalier J; Sewell F; Drew J
    Dev Psychobiol; 1993 Sep; 26(6):345-57. PubMed ID: 8119484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neonatal aspiration lesions of the hippocampal formation impair visual recognition memory when assessed by paired-comparison task but not by delayed nonmatching-to-sample task.
    Pascalis O; Bachevalier J
    Hippocampus; 1999; 9(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 10641753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's performance on "animal tests" of oddity: implications for cognitive processes required for tests of oddity and delayed nonmatch to sample.
    Overman W; Bachevalier J; Miller M; Moore K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Jul; 62(2):223-42. PubMed ID: 8683187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence of robust recognition memory early in life even when assessed by reaching behavior.
    Diamond A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Jun; 59(3):419-56. PubMed ID: 7622987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.
    Chouinard MM
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2007; 72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. PubMed ID: 17394580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences in orbitofrontal activation: an fMRI investigation of delayed match and nonmatch to sample.
    Lamar M; Yousem DM; Resnick SM
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1368-76. PubMed ID: 15050562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of visual impairment on measures of cognitive function for children with congenital toxoplasmosis: implications for compensatory intervention strategies.
    Roizen N; Kasza K; Karrison T; Mets M; Noble AG; Boyer K; Swisher C; Meier P; Remington J; Jalbrzikowski J; McLeod R; Kipp M; Rabiah P; Chamot D; Estes R; Cezar S; Mack D; Pfiffner L; Stein M; Danis B; Patel D; Hopkins J; Holfels E; Stein L; Withers S; Cameron A; Perkins J; Heydemann P
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e379-90. PubMed ID: 16864640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of familiarization time, retention interval, and context change on adults' performance in the visual paired-comparison task.
    Richmond J; Sowerby P; Colombo M; Hayne H
    Dev Psychobiol; 2004 Mar; 44(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 14994266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention and recognition memory in the 1st year of life: a longitudinal study of preterm and full-term infants.
    Rose SA; Feldman JF; Jankowski JJ
    Dev Psychol; 2001 Jan; 37(1):135-51. PubMed ID: 11206428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task.
    Richmond J; Colombo M; Hayne H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 17723062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in infant visual attention: are short lookers faster processors or feature processors?
    Colombo J; Mitchell DW; Coldren JT; Freeseman LJ
    Child Dev; 1991 Dec; 62(6):1247-57. PubMed ID: 1786713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of gaze-aversion on visual-spatial imagination.
    Markson L; Paterson KB
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 100(Pt 3):553-63. PubMed ID: 19021925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Categorization and abstraction abilities in 3-year-old children: a comparison with monkey data.
    Bovet D; Vauclair J; Blaye A
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Jan; 8(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 15300466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perirhinal and hippocampal contributions to visual recognition memory can be distinguished from those of occipito-temporal structures based on conscious awareness of prior occurrence.
    Danckert SL; Gati JS; Menon RS; Köhler S
    Hippocampus; 2007; 17(11):1081-92. PubMed ID: 17696171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual recognition memory: a predictor of later cognitive functioning in preterms.
    Rose SA; Wallace IF
    Child Dev; 1985 Aug; 56(4):843-52. PubMed ID: 4042748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A longitudinal investigation of visual event-related potentials in the first year of life.
    Webb SJ; Long JD; Nelson CA
    Dev Sci; 2005 Nov; 8(6):605-16. PubMed ID: 16246251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental changes in infants' retention of visual stimuli.
    Rose SA
    Child Dev; 1981 Mar; 52(1):227-33. PubMed ID: 7238147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence from two genetic syndromes for the independence of spatial and visual working memory.
    Vicari S; Bellucci S; Carlesimo GA
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2006 Feb; 48(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16417668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prenatal cocaine exposure and prolonged focus attention. Poor infant information processing ability or precocious maturation of attentional systems?
    Chiriboga CA; Starr D; Kuhn L; Wasserman GA
    Dev Neurosci; 2009; 31(1-2):149-58. PubMed ID: 19372695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.