484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8120347)
1. Restructuring federalism: the impact of Reagan policies on the family planning program.
McFarlane DR; Meier KJ
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1993; 18(4):821-50. PubMed ID: 8120347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Family planning needs: an empirical study of federal responsiveness before and during the Reagan administration.
Mcfarlane DR
J Prim Prev; 1988; 9(1-2):41-56. PubMed ID: 12281989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Restructuring federalism: the effects of decentralized federal policy on states' responsiveness to family planning needs.
McFarlane DR
Women Health; 1992; 19(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 1475995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 1984 Presidential election: issues of relevance to child and adolescent health.
Mondale WF; Reagan RW
J Sch Health; 1984 Oct; 54(9):366-70. PubMed ID: 6568361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
Nestor B; Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.
Gold RB; Sonfield A
Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 10435216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case.
Wing KR
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A benefit-cost analysis of family planning services in Iowa.
Levey LM; Nyman JA; Haugaard J
Eval Health Prof; 1988 Dec; 11(4):403-24. PubMed ID: 10312809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. States continue to expand eligibility for family planning services under Medicaid.
Gold RB
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):3-5. PubMed ID: 12347484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do different funding mechanisms produce different results? The implications of family planning for fiscal federalism.
McFarlane DR; Meier KJ
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1998 Jun; 23(3):423-54. PubMed ID: 9626640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uniting to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
Lynch D
Sun; 1994 Feb; ():18A. PubMed ID: 12287871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Probable future funding priorities in maternal and child health: a modified Delphi National Survey.
Loos GP; Smith RG; Roseman C
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1985; 9(4):683-93. PubMed ID: 3882822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion-related issues in the U.S. foreign assistance program.
Mchugh JT
Int Rev; 1988; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 12179687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planning for the next generation.
Valdes C
People Planet; 1992; 1(3):24-5. PubMed ID: 12317703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Family planning programs and birth control in the third world].
Wohlschlagl H
Demogr Inf; 1991; ():17-34, 153. PubMed ID: 12343122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health policy and population policy--a relationship redefined.
Jaffe FS
Am J Public Health; 1973 May; 63(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 4700652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Public funding of contraceptive services, 1980-1982.
Nestor B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 6811312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The New Right and family politics.
Somerville J
Econ Soc; 1992 May; 21(2):93-128. PubMed ID: 12317778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, fiscal year 1990.
Gold RB; Daley D
Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(5):204-11. PubMed ID: 1743272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
