182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8120429)
1. [Morphological study of the axial view of the cervical spinal cord by MR images].
Suzuki M; Shimamura T
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jan; 68(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8120429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Sagittal diameters measurements on MR of the cervical spinal cord in normal subjects].
Fang JH; Jia LS; Zhou XH; Chen XS; Zhang Y
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 46(21):1642-4. PubMed ID: 19094760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI measurements of the cervical spine and their correlation to Pavlov's ratio.
Prasad SS; O'Malley M; Caplan M; Shackleford IM; Pydisetty RK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1263-8. PubMed ID: 12811269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging measurements for assessing cervical spinal canal stenosis.
Rüegg TB; Wicki AG; Aebli N; Wisianowsky C; Krebs J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 25525959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Wang LF; Ding WY; Xu JX; He J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E396-9. PubMed ID: 20393392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic evaluation of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique.
Miura J; Doita M; Miyata K; Marui T; Nishida K; Fujii M; Kurosaka M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Feb; 22(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19190428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Large vertebral body, in addition to narrow spinal canal, are risk factors for cervical myelopathy.
Hukuda S; Xiang LF; Imai S; Katsuura A; Imanaka T
J Spinal Disord; 1996 Jun; 9(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 8854271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Morphological changes of the cervical spinal canal and cord due to aging].
Tanaka Y
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Sep; 58(9):873-86. PubMed ID: 6520497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes of cervical spinal cord and cervical spinal canal with age in asymptomatic subjects.
Ishikawa M; Matsumoto M; Fujimura Y; Chiba K; Toyama Y
Spinal Cord; 2003 Mar; 41(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12612618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of the cervical spinal cord volume on MRI.
Yanase M; Matsuyama Y; Hirose K; Takagi H; Yamada M; Iwata H; Ishiguro N
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 16760787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome.
Houten JK; Cooper PR
Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 12699550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spinal cord decompression via microsurgical anterior foraminotomy for spondylotic cervical myelopathy.
Jho HD
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 1997 Dec; 40(4):124-9. PubMed ID: 9477400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with standing cervical radiographs for evaluation of vertebral canal stenosis in equine cervical stenotic myelopathy.
Janes JG; Garrett KS; McQuerry KJ; Pease AP; Williams NM; Reed SM; MacLeod JN
Equine Vet J; 2014 Nov; 46(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 24329734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-sectional transverse area and hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging in relation to the clinical picture in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Kadanka Z; Kerkovsky M; Bednarik J; Jarkovsky J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2573-7. PubMed ID: 17978656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Image and clinical correlative studies on cervical spinal canal stenosis].
Tan J; Wang W; Jia L
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Nov; 33(11):690-4. PubMed ID: 8731917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between magnetic resonance imaging and quantitative electromyography findings in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy.
Hattori S; Kawai K; Mabuchi Y; Shibayama M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E290-4. PubMed ID: 20354473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphologic analysis of the cervical spinal cord, dural tube, and spinal canal by magnetic resonance imaging in normal adults and patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Okada Y; Ikata T; Katoh S; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Oct; 19(20):2331-5. PubMed ID: 7846579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord: age and cervical spondylosis-related changes.
Mamata H; Jolesz FA; Maier SE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15971186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Kinetic analysis of the cervical spinal cord in patients after spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique.
Miyata K; Marui T; Miura J; Yoshiya S; Fujii M; Kurosaka M; Doita M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):E690-7. PubMed ID: 16946642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical compression myelopathy with neurologic and radiologic severity.
Aota Y; Niwa T; Uesugi M; Yamashita T; Inoue T; Saito T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(7):814-20. PubMed ID: 18379411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
