These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8120429)
1. [Morphological study of the axial view of the cervical spinal cord by MR images]. Suzuki M; Shimamura T Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jan; 68(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8120429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Sagittal diameters measurements on MR of the cervical spinal cord in normal subjects]. Fang JH; Jia LS; Zhou XH; Chen XS; Zhang Y Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 46(21):1642-4. PubMed ID: 19094760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI measurements of the cervical spine and their correlation to Pavlov's ratio. Prasad SS; O'Malley M; Caplan M; Shackleford IM; Pydisetty RK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1263-8. PubMed ID: 12811269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging measurements for assessing cervical spinal canal stenosis. Rüegg TB; Wicki AG; Aebli N; Wisianowsky C; Krebs J J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 25525959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Wang LF; Ding WY; Xu JX; He J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E396-9. PubMed ID: 20393392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic evaluation of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique. Miura J; Doita M; Miyata K; Marui T; Nishida K; Fujii M; Kurosaka M J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Feb; 22(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19190428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Large vertebral body, in addition to narrow spinal canal, are risk factors for cervical myelopathy. Hukuda S; Xiang LF; Imai S; Katsuura A; Imanaka T J Spinal Disord; 1996 Jun; 9(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 8854271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Morphological changes of the cervical spinal canal and cord due to aging]. Tanaka Y Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Sep; 58(9):873-86. PubMed ID: 6520497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes of cervical spinal cord and cervical spinal canal with age in asymptomatic subjects. Ishikawa M; Matsumoto M; Fujimura Y; Chiba K; Toyama Y Spinal Cord; 2003 Mar; 41(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12612618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of the cervical spinal cord volume on MRI. Yanase M; Matsuyama Y; Hirose K; Takagi H; Yamada M; Iwata H; Ishiguro N J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 16760787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Houten JK; Cooper PR Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 12699550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spinal cord decompression via microsurgical anterior foraminotomy for spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Jho HD Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 1997 Dec; 40(4):124-9. PubMed ID: 9477400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with standing cervical radiographs for evaluation of vertebral canal stenosis in equine cervical stenotic myelopathy. Janes JG; Garrett KS; McQuerry KJ; Pease AP; Williams NM; Reed SM; MacLeod JN Equine Vet J; 2014 Nov; 46(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 24329734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-sectional transverse area and hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging in relation to the clinical picture in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Kadanka Z; Kerkovsky M; Bednarik J; Jarkovsky J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2573-7. PubMed ID: 17978656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Image and clinical correlative studies on cervical spinal canal stenosis]. Tan J; Wang W; Jia L Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Nov; 33(11):690-4. PubMed ID: 8731917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between magnetic resonance imaging and quantitative electromyography findings in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy. Hattori S; Kawai K; Mabuchi Y; Shibayama M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E290-4. PubMed ID: 20354473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphologic analysis of the cervical spinal cord, dural tube, and spinal canal by magnetic resonance imaging in normal adults and patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Okada Y; Ikata T; Katoh S; Yamada H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Oct; 19(20):2331-5. PubMed ID: 7846579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord: age and cervical spondylosis-related changes. Mamata H; Jolesz FA; Maier SE J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15971186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Kinetic analysis of the cervical spinal cord in patients after spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique. Miyata K; Marui T; Miura J; Yoshiya S; Fujii M; Kurosaka M; Doita M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):E690-7. PubMed ID: 16946642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical compression myelopathy with neurologic and radiologic severity. Aota Y; Niwa T; Uesugi M; Yamashita T; Inoue T; Saito T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(7):814-20. PubMed ID: 18379411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]