341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8120853)
1. Vaginal delivery from the persistent occiput posterior position. Influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity.
Pearl ML; Roberts JM; Laros RK; Hurd WW
J Reprod Med; 1993 Dec; 38(12):955-61. PubMed ID: 8120853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Instrumental extractions using Thierry's spatulas: evaluation of the risk of perineal laceration according to occiput position in operative deliveries].
Courtois L; Becher P; Maticot-Baptista D; Cour A; Zurlinden B; Millet P; Maisonnette-Escot Y; Riethmuller D; Maillet R
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 May; 37(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 18093747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries.
Wu JM; Williams KS; Hundley AF; Connolly A; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 193(2):525-8; discussion 528-9. PubMed ID: 16098883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001.
Cheng YW; Shaffer BL; Caughey AB
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Sep; 19(9):563-8. PubMed ID: 16966125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome.
Senécal J; Xiong X; Fraser WD;
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):763-72. PubMed ID: 15802403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Is primiparity, the only risk factor for type 3 and 4 perineal injury, during delivery?].
Barbier A; Poujade O; Fay R; Thiébaugeorges O; Levardon M; Deval B
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Feb; 35(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 17291807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ
BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Immediate fetal-maternal morbidity of first instrumental vaginal delivery using Thierry's spatulas. A prospective continuous study of 195 fetal extractions].
Parant O; Simon-Toulza C; Capdet J; Fuzier V; Arnaud C; Rème JM
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Oct; 37(10):780-6. PubMed ID: 19766049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing high-order perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery.
Hirsch E; Haney EI; Gordon TE; Silver RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):668.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18395688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effects of persistent occiput posterior presentation on mode of delivery].
Gardberg M; Tuppurainen M
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1994 Aug; 198(4):117-9. PubMed ID: 7975796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Does persistent occiput posterior position increase the risk of severe perineal laceration?].
Salameh C; Canoui-Poitrine F; Cortet M; Lafon A; Rudigoz RC; Huissoud C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Oct; 39(10):545-8. PubMed ID: 21873097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perineal lacerations during spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Bodner K; Bodner-Adler B; Wagenbichler P; Kaider A; Leodolter S; Husslein P; Mayerhofer K
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Oct; 113(19):743-6. PubMed ID: 11715753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.
Hudelist G; Gelle'n J; Singer C; Ruecklinger E; Czerwenka K; Kandolf O; Keckstein J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):875-81. PubMed ID: 15746685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maternal and neonatal effects of outlet forceps delivery compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery in term pregnancies.
Yancey MK; Herpolsheimer A; Jordan GD; Benson WL; Brady K
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 78(4):646-50. PubMed ID: 1923169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of rotation on perineal lacerations in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
Bradley MS; Kaminski RJ; Streitman DC; Dunn SL; Krans EE
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 122(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 23743462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.
de Leeuw JW; de Wit C; Kuijken JP; Bruinse HW
BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17999693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for severe perineal tear: can we do better?
Riskin-Mashiah S; O'Brian Smith E; Wilkins IA
Am J Perinatol; 2002 Jul; 19(5):225-34. PubMed ID: 12152139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum.
Kudish B; Blackwell S; Mcneeley SG; Bujold E; Kruger M; Hendrix SL; Sokol R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):749-54. PubMed ID: 16949408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
