BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8120853)

  • 21. Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study.
    Simic M; Cnattingius S; Petersson G; Sandström A; Stephansson O
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Feb; 17(1):72. PubMed ID: 28222704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Length of the second stage of labor as a predictor of perineal outcome after vaginal delivery.
    Sheiner E; Walfisch A; Hallak M; Harlev S; Mazor M; Shoham-Vardi I
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Feb; 51(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 16572912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Antenatal use of a novel vaginal birth training device by term primiparous women in Singapore.
    Kok J; Tan KH; Koh S; Cheng PS; Lim WY; Yew ML; Yeo GS
    Singapore Med J; 2004 Jul; 45(7):318-23. PubMed ID: 15221047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of uterine fundal pressure maneuver at vaginal delivery and risk of severe perineal laceration.
    Matsuo K; Shiki Y; Yamasaki M; Shimoya K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 280(5):781-6. PubMed ID: 19263062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Higher Rates of Operative Delivery and Maternal and Neonatal Complications in Persistent Occiput Posterior Position with a Large Head Circumference: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Yagel O; Cohen SM; Lipschuetz M; Bdolah-Abram T; Amsalem H; Kabiri D; Yagel S
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2018; 44(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 28728149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Caughey AB; Sandberg PL; Zlatnik MG; Thiet MP; Parer JT; Laros RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):908-12. PubMed ID: 16260505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Episiotomy and increase in the risk of obstetric laceration in a subsequent vaginal delivery.
    Alperin M; Krohn MA; Parviainen K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1274-8. PubMed ID: 18515508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury.
    Damron DP; Capeless EL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 15467563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does midline episiotomy increase the risk of third- and fourth-degree lacerations in operative vaginal deliveries?
    Helwig JT; Thorp JM; Bowes WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):276-9. PubMed ID: 8336877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Occipito-posterior fetal head position, maternal and neonatal outcome].
    Martino V; Iliceto N; Simeoni U
    Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 17923836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of women at high risk for severe perineal lacerations.
    Schmitz T; Alberti C; Andriss B; Moutafoff C; Oury JF; Sibony O
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():11-5. PubMed ID: 25218546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Maternal and fetal prognosis of occipito-posterior presentation].
    Riethmuller D; Teffaud O; Eyraud JL; Sautière JL; Schaal JP; Maillet R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Feb; 28(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 10394515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Kielland vs. nonrotational forceps for the second stage of labor.
    Krivak TC; Drewes P; Horowitz GM
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Jun; 44(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 10394545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Getting through birth in one piece: protecting the perineum.
    Hastings-Tolsma M; Vincent D; Emeis C; Francisco T
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2007; 32(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 17479052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States.
    Fenner DE; Genberg B; Brahma P; Marek L; DeLancey JO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 189(6):1543-9; discussion 1549-50. PubMed ID: 14710059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Episiotomy: the final cut?
    Steiner N; Weintraub AY; Wiznitzer A; Sergienko R; Sheiner E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1369-73. PubMed ID: 22810620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.
    Sheiner E; Levy A; Walfisch A; Hallak M; Mazor M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Apr; 271(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 15024575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Episiotomy and perineal lesions in spontaneous vaginal delivery].
    Henriksen TB; Bek KM; Hedegaard M; Secher NJ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 May; 156(21):3176-9. PubMed ID: 8066836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A retrospective analysis of Erb's palsy cases and their relation to birth weight and trauma at delivery.
    Graham EM; Forouzan I; Morgan MA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9029377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.