BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8121235)

  • 1. Legal considerations of medical imaging.
    James AE; James E; Johnson B; James J
    Leg Med; 1993; ():87-113. PubMed ID: 8121235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quality-service connection.
    Valdez F
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Aug; 14(8):16, 19-21. PubMed ID: 10151502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MedPAC--Quality family time.
    Mulaik MW
    Radiol Manage; 2005; 27(5):12, 14-5. PubMed ID: 16294581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical imaging. Hospitals give renewed attention to service, costs, flow of images.
    Lumsdon K; Hard R
    Hospitals; 1992 Nov; 66(21):56, 58, 60-2. PubMed ID: 1427718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging.
    Hospitals; 1990 Nov; 64(21):24-33. PubMed ID: 2227875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reform's impact on medical imaging.
    Weil T
    Adm Radiol; 1993 Oct; 12(10):45-50. PubMed ID: 10130008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The goal of medical imaging.
    Sanders B
    Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 11962068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospitals are next as HCFA continues imaging fee cuts.
    Hayes JC
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Jan; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 11692379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of managed care on diagnostic imaging.
    Johnson KC; Thrall JH
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1993 Dec; 12(16):1-16. PubMed ID: 10130238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital-physician imaging ventures.
    Kyle F; Metry R
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Jul; 11(7):30-3. PubMed ID: 10121751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiological accessories.
    Souhrada L
    Hospitals; 1988 Nov; 62(21):74, 77. PubMed ID: 3181899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospitals cutting expenses with remanufactured radiology equipment.
    Werner C
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1993 Feb; 18(2):11. PubMed ID: 10123847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Saving radiology dollars with portable imaging.
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1995 Apr; 20(4):11. PubMed ID: 10141882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Financial measures key to surviving pricing squeeze.
    Johnsson J
    Hospitals; 1990 Nov; 64(21):25-8. PubMed ID: 2227876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical imaging meets the proforma. A financial exercise for imaging directors.
    Yoder E
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(2):52-6. PubMed ID: 15098905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New dyes' higher costs cause controversy.
    Wagner M
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(3):45. PubMed ID: 10291656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Staying even with the board. Impact of new regulations on operational well being.
    Hoppszallern S; Hughes CM
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Nov; 7(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 10303060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging project highlights timeliness issues.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1997 Feb; 4(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 10175281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antitrust relief seen as minimal.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1993 Sep; 23(39):28, 43. PubMed ID: 10128473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exclusive contracting: the original economic credentialing.
    Baxter MJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Apr; 26(4):97-103. PubMed ID: 10127076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.