168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8121604)
1. [The Papanicolaou classification in the Bethesda system (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland)].
Broso PR; Buffetti G
Minerva Ginecol; 1993 Nov; 45(11):557-63. PubMed ID: 8121604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From Papanicolaou to Bethesda: the rationale for a new cervical cytologic classification.
Kurman RJ; Malkasian GD; Sedlis A; Solomon D
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):779-82. PubMed ID: 1849626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Bethesda System. A proposal for reporting abnormal cervical smears based on the reproducibility of cytopathologic diagnoses.
Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Erozan YS; Wacholder S; Kurman RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Nov; 116(11):1155-8. PubMed ID: 1444745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Only a small fraction of high-grade cervical lesions are discovered after an interpretation of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance when using imager-assisted, liquid-based papanicolaou tests and the Bethesda 2001 system.
Khan KA; Smith DA; Thrall MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 137(7):936-41. PubMed ID: 22994456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of human papillomavirus distribution in cytologic subgroups of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Zuna RE; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):288-97. PubMed ID: 16952155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical squamous cells: update on current concepts.
Nayar R; Tabbara SO
Clin Lab Med; 2003 Sep; 23(3):605-32. PubMed ID: 14560531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Solomon D; Frable WJ; Vooijs GP; Wilbur DC; Amma NS; Collins RJ; Davey DD; Knight BK; Luff RD; Meisels A; Navin J; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Stoler M; Suprun HZ; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9479320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Review of the Bethesda System atlas does not improve reproducibility or accuracy in the classification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance smears.
Smith AE; Sherman ME; Scott DR; Tabbara SO; Dworkin L; Olson J; Thompson J; Faser C; Snell J; Schiffman M
Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10966559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-grade Papanicolaou smears and the Bethesda system: a prospective cytohistopathologic analysis.
Lonky NM; Navarre GL; Saunders S; Sadeghi M; Wolde-Tsadik G
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 85(5 Pt 1):716-20. PubMed ID: 7724102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical significance of the poor correlation of cervical dysplasia and cervical malignancy with referral cytologic results.
Lonky NM; Sadeghi M; Tsadik GW; Petitti D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):560-6. PubMed ID: 10486464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: correlative histologic and follow-up studies from an academic medical center.
Williams ML; Rimm DL; Pedigo MA; Frable WJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Jan; 16(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9034728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Controversies in the Bethesda System. To diagnose atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or not to diagnose?].
Malarewicz A
Ginekol Pol; 2004 Oct; 75(10):807-13. PubMed ID: 15587914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atypical epithelial cells and specimen adequacy: current laboratory practices of participants in the college of American pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology.
Davey DD; Woodhouse S; Styer P; Stastny J; Mody D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Feb; 124(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 10656727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Brotzman GL; Julian TM
Am Fam Physician; 1996 Mar; 53(4):1154-62. PubMed ID: 8629563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
