BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8122855)

  • 1. [Carotid angiography by magnetic resonance].
    Friedrich JM; Nöldecke HA; Tomczak R; Merkle E; Orend KH
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1993 Oct; 42(8):69-75. PubMed ID: 8122855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Angiography with magnetic resonance of the ++carotid arteries. Evaluation of clinical results obtained with low magnetic field equipment].
    Pavone P; Catalano C; Di Girolamo M; Albertini Petroni G; Marsili L; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 1993 Nov; 86(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 8272541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance angiography of extracranial carotid and vertebral arteries, including their origins: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Furuya Y; Isoda H; Hasegawa S; Takahashi M; Kaneko M; Uemura K
    Neuroradiology; 1992; 35(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 1289737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical potentialities and limitations of two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis].
    Nöldeke HA; Friedrich JM; Wallner B; Weidenmaier W
    Rofo; 1992 Dec; 157(6):566-72. PubMed ID: 1457793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
    De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Multiple slab MR angiography of the A. carotis interna: a preoperative comparative study].
    Vogl TJ; Heinzinger K; Juergens M; Kutter R; Hepp W; Balzer JO; Haupt G; Banzer D; Felix R
    Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):404-11. PubMed ID: 7772762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Role of 0.5 T magnetic resonance and duplex ultrasonography in the imaging of stenotic and oblitertive changes in the carotid arteries].
    Hebrang A; Brinar V; Vidjak V; Grga A; Sarlija M; Sosa T; Tomac S; Drasković J
    Lijec Vjesn; 2002 May; 124(5):129-33. PubMed ID: 12152411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
    White JE; Russell WL; Greer MS; Whittle MT
    Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dedicated head-neck coil in MR angiography of the supra-aortic arteries from the aortic arch to the circle of Willis.
    Strotzer M; Fellner C; Fraunhofer S; Gmeinwieser J; Albrich H; Seitz J; Feuerbach S
    Acta Radiol; 1998 May; 39(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 9571938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [MR angiography of the carotid arteries using 3D TOF technique with sagittal double-volume acquisition using a new head-neck coil].
    Link J; Brinkmann G; Steffens JC; Graessner J; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Heller M
    Rofo; 1996 Dec; 165(6):544-50. PubMed ID: 9026096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography.
    Spartera C; Morettini G; Marino G; Marsili L; Di Cesare E; La Barbera G; Petrassi C; Ventura M
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1993 Jun; 34(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 8344970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR angiography of the supra-aortic arteries using a dedicated head and neck coil: image quality and assessment of stenoses.
    Fellner C; Strotzer M; Fraunhofer S; Held P; Spies V; Seitz J; Fellner F
    Neuroradiology; 1997 Nov; 39(11):763-71. PubMed ID: 9406200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Chiras J; Dormont D; Marsault C
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 14563902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
    Liberopoulos K; Kaponis A; Kokkinis K; Pagratis N; Nicolakopoulou Z; Douskou M; Stringaris K; Clonaris C; Balas P
    Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional rotational angiography of the carotid arteries with high-flow injection from the aortic arch. Preliminary experience.
    Pozzi Mucelli F; Calgaro A; Bruni S; Bottaro L; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 2005; 109(1-2):108-17. PubMed ID: 15729191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Willig DS; Turski PA; Frayne R; Graves VB; Korosec FR; Swan JS; Mistretta CA; Grist TM
    Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):447-51. PubMed ID: 9680574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
    Scarabino T; Carriero A; Balzano S; Sciannelli V; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
    Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9638160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Stenosis of the extracranial carotid artery].
    Kramer J; Wimberger D; Haimberger K; Marosi L; Schurawitzki H; Stiglbauer R; Imhof H
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1993; 105(7):194-9. PubMed ID: 8465524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences.
    U-King-Im JM; Trivedi R; Cross J; Higgins N; Graves M; Kirkpatrick P; Antoun N; Gillard JH
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 15041456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.