165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8123927)
1. Porcine aortic leaflet arrangement may contribute to clinical xenograft failure.
Grande KJ; Kunzelman KS; Cochran RP; David TE; Verrier ED
ASAIO J; 1993; 39(4):918-22. PubMed ID: 8123927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Specific features of the structure of the porcine aortic valve as a potential xenograft for the substitution of the human aorta valve].
Gavrilenkov VI
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 2004; 163(3):28-34. PubMed ID: 15317157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of human and porcine aortic valves.
Sim EK; Muskawad S; Lim CS; Yeo JH; Lim KH; Grignani RT; Durrani A; Lau G; Duran C
Clin Anat; 2003 May; 16(3):193-6. PubMed ID: 12673813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second-generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques.
Mayne AS; Christie GW; Smaill BH; Hunter PJ; Barratt-Boyes BG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Aug; 98(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 2755150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structural deterioration of the Freestyle aortic valve: mode of presentation and mechanisms.
Mohammadi S; Baillot R; Voisine P; Mathieu P; Dagenais F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 16872969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frame-mounted porcine valve bioprostheses: preparation during aortic-root dilation. Biomechanics and design considerations.
Butterfield M; Fisher J; Lockie KJ; Davies GA; Watterson K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Dec; 106(6):1181-8. PubMed ID: 8246557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ventriculo-aortic junction in human root. A geometric approach.
Grousson N; Lim KH; Lim HS; Ooi ET; Salgues SL; Yeo JH; Goetz WA
J Biomech; 2007; 40(10):2167-73. PubMed ID: 17166505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Porcine aortic valve bioprostheses: morphologic and functional considerations.
Hilbert SL; Ferrans VJ
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1992; 2(2-3):99-112. PubMed ID: 10148319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristics of compressive strains in porcine aortic valves cusps.
Adamczyk MM; Vesely I
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 11843509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: a ten-year experience.
David TE; Feindel CM; Scully HE; Bos J; Rakowski H
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9651835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation.
Puvimanasinghe JP; Takkenberg JJ; Edwards MB; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW; Van Herwerden LA; Taylor KM; Grunkemeier GL; Habbema JD; Bogers AJ
Heart; 2004 Oct; 90(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 15367517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of macroscopic lipid content within porcine pulmonary and aortic valves. Implications for bioprosthetic valves.
Dunmore-Buyze J; Boughner DR; Macris N; Vesely I
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Dec; 110(6):1756-61. PubMed ID: 8523888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The pulmonary bioprosthetic heart valve: its unsuitability for use as an aortic valve replacement.
Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Booth C; Watterson KG; Fisher J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):668-78; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 12358404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A pulsatile flow study comparing the Hancock porcine xenograft aortic valve prostheses models 242 and 250.
Wright JT
Med Instrum; 1977; 11(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 859469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aortic valve hydrodynamics: considerations on the absence of sinuses of Valsalva.
Bottio T; Buratto E; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 23409351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathological analysis of nonstented Freestyle aortic root bioprostheses treated with amino oleic acid.
Fyfe BS; Schoen FJ
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):151-6. PubMed ID: 10660184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
