These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8124293)
1. Does motion-induced grouping modulate the flanker compatibility effect?: A failure to replicate Driver & Baylis. Berry G; Klein R Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Dec; 47(4):714-29. PubMed ID: 8124293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Movement and focused attention: a failure to replicate. Kramer AF; Tham MP; Yeh YY Percept Psychophys; 1991 Dec; 50(6):537-46. PubMed ID: 1780201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual grouping in space and time: evidence from the Ternus display. Kramer P; Yantis S Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 9038411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors. Baylis GC; Driver J Percept Psychophys; 1992 Feb; 51(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 1549433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Object-based selection in the Baylis and Driver (1993) paradigm is subject to space-based attentional modulation. Müller HJ; O'Grady R; Krummenacher J; Heller D Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):609-29. PubMed ID: 18925416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Kramer AF; Jacobson A Percept Psychophys; 1991 Sep; 50(3):267-84. PubMed ID: 1754368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined effects of perceptual grouping cues on object representation: evidence from motion-induced blindness. Shibata M; Kawachi Y; Gyoba J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):387-97. PubMed ID: 20139454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields. Royden CS; Wolfe JM; Klempen N Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 11414131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient? Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. Driver J; Baylis GC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):448-56. PubMed ID: 2527954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space. Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shifting attention in visual space: tests of moving-spotlight models versus an activity-distribution model. LaBerge D; Carlson RL; Williams JK; Bunney BG J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Oct; 23(5):1380-92. PubMed ID: 9336958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Induced motion and the visual vertical: effects of frame size. Brooks JN; Sherrick MF Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Dec; 79(3 Pt 2):1443-50. PubMed ID: 7870529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of background motion on line bisection performance in normal subjects. Na DL; Son Y; Kim CH; Lee BH; Shon YM; Lee KJ; Lee KM; Adair JC; Watson RT; Heilman KM Cortex; 2002 Dec; 38(5):787-96. PubMed ID: 12507047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention. Goolkasian P Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Müller HJ; von Mühlenen A Percept Psychophys; 1996 Feb; 58(2):224-49. PubMed ID: 8838166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the adjacency between background cues and objects in visual localization during ocular pursuit. Mateeff S; Hohnsbein J Perception; 1989; 18(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 2771598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]