146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8124431)
1. Problems and conflicts in peer review.
Kohn A; Putterman C
Int J Impot Res; 1993 Sep; 5(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 8124431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Peer review: a closed system in need of reform].
Thörn A
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3106-8. PubMed ID: 12198928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Some hints about the reviewers' ethical dilemmas].
Rumboldt Z
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Dec; 62(5):443-6. PubMed ID: 19382625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review.
Wenneras C; Wold A
Nature; 1997 May; 387(6631):341-3. PubMed ID: 9163412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Journal policy on ethics in scientific publication.
Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 12514687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EURYI: present procedure risks conflicts of interest.
Lente G
Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7056):192. PubMed ID: 16148909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: leadership responsibilities and cautions.
Patton DE; Olin SS
Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 16492173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Publishing of scientific studies is no longer dependent on considerations of space in medical journals].
Eliasson M
Lakartidningen; 2001 Nov; 98(47):5394. PubMed ID: 11763644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conflicts of interest and scientific integrity.
Friedman L; Richter ED
Int J Occup Environ Health; 2005; 11(2):205-6. PubMed ID: 15875898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What authors need to know about the way editors think: report from the congress on peer review in biomedical publication.
Neale AV
Fam Med; 2002 Feb; 34(2):138-9. PubMed ID: 11874024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].
Thörn A
Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ethics in articles published in medical journals].
Reyes H; Palma J; Andresen M
Rev Med Chil; 2007 Apr; 135(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 17554464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Industry sponsorship in research and publishing: who is really to blame for perceived bias?
Amsden GW
Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Apr; 38(4):714-6. PubMed ID: 14982974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The corporate coauthor.
Fugh-Berman A
J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 20(6):546-8. PubMed ID: 15987332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Addressing conflicts of interest and clouding of objectivity: BJSM's "peer review: fair review" section.
Khan KM; Stovitz SD; Pluim B; Cook JL; Bahr R; Arendt EA; Noakes TD
Br J Sports Med; 2008 Feb; 42(2):79. PubMed ID: 18256294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [More stringent requirements concerning manuscripts. Declarations of potential connections and conflicts of interest published in the Lakartidningen].
Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Agren H; Ostergren J
Lakartidningen; 2002 Apr; 99(15):1662-3. PubMed ID: 12025190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Subliminal editorial conundra confounding publication of multicenter trials.
Frohlich ED; Pepine CJ
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Nov; 94(10):1268-9. PubMed ID: 15541242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
