These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8126393)

  • 21. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.
    Mazur JE; Biondi DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 19794834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rats' choices between one and two delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 17918422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimation of indifference points with an adjusting-delay procedure.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 3346621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tests of transitivity in choices between fixed and variable reinforcer delays.
    Mazur JE; Coe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 May; 47(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 3612019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of pre-trial response requirements on self-control choices by rats and pigeons.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Mar; 97(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 22389527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.
    Grace RC; Bedell MA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 12083678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Choice in situations of time-based diminishing returns: immediate versus delayed consequences of action.
    Hackenberg TD; Hineline PN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jan; 57(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 1548449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Choice between single and multiple reinforcers in concurrent-chains schedules.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 17002228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.
    Spetch ML; Dunn R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 3559459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intertrial interval duration and impulsive choice.
    Smethells JR; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 25533662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of response rate on reward value in a self-control task.
    Fortes I; Vasconcelos M; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 25533528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preference pulses without reinforcers.
    McLean AP; Grace RC; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 24676669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.
    Schaal DW; Schuh KJ; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 1402602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Token reinforcement, choice, and self-control in pigeons.
    Jackson K; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jul; 66(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 8755699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
    Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of free food deliveries and temporal contiguity on choice under concurrent-chain schedules.
    Scoones C; Hucks A; McLean AP; Grace RC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Aug; 16(4):736-41. PubMed ID: 19648461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules.
    Mazur JE; Vaughan W
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Sep; 48(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 3681185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.