These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8126655)

  • 1. Preferred frequency response for two- and three-channel amplification systems.
    Dirks DD; Ahlstrom J; Noffsinger PD
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 8126655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification of steady state gain reduction produced by amplitude modulation based noise reduction in digital hearing aids.
    Hoetink AE; Körössy L; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):444-55. PubMed ID: 19925331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms.
    Simpson A; Hersbach AA; McDermott HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):619-29. PubMed ID: 17118905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-channel and multichannel digitally programmable hearing aids in children with hearing impairment.
    Zorowka PG; Lippert KL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():159-62. PubMed ID: 7668615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: the effect of different control configurations.
    Dreschler WA; Keidser G; Convery E; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 18490863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Plyler PN; Fleck EL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):616-27. PubMed ID: 16787899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect on the speech reception threshold in noise of the recovery time of the compressor in the high-frequency channel of a two-channel aid.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():82-91. PubMed ID: 8153569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of the base line response on self-adjustments of hearing aid gain.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Convery E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1668-81. PubMed ID: 19045657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of low-frequency gain and venting effects on the benefit derived from directionality and noise reduction in hearing aids.
    Keidser G; Carter L; Chalupper J; Dillon H
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):554-68. PubMed ID: 17922345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
    Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the desired sensation level [input/output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: the acceptable range for amplified conversational speech.
    Jenstad LM; Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Cornelisse LE; Scicluna R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):793-811. PubMed ID: 17982367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Presentation of a 16-filter hearing aid with selective amplification and compression].
    Genin J; Chouard CH; Meyer B; Mellah A; Bitjoka L; Secqueville T
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1991; 108(4):212-8. PubMed ID: 1854146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A screening procedure for modified simplex in frequency-gain response selection.
    Kuk FK
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 8194680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A signal processing scheme for output limitation.
    Bentler RA; Pavlovic CV; Abbas PJ
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():230-5. PubMed ID: 2356733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.