These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
53. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments. Kiessling J; Steffens T Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms. Simpson A; Hersbach AA; McDermott HJ Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):619-29. PubMed ID: 17118905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Preferred frequency response for two- and three-channel amplification systems. Dirks DD; Ahlstrom J; Noffsinger PD J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 8126655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters. Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Classification of steady state gain reduction produced by amplitude modulation based noise reduction in digital hearing aids. Hoetink AE; Körössy L; Dreschler WA Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):444-55. PubMed ID: 19925331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]